CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

Scoping study to assess needs and options to redevelop NAFRI's analytical laboratory

Project Leader

Dr Christian Roth

Email

christian.roth@csiro.au

Phone

07 3833 5732

Project Country

Project ID: 

SMCN/2010/084

Start Date

01/08/2011

Reference Number

CT-200511-52587

Project Type

Other

Project Status

Concluded

Final Progress Report

Three major bottlenecks have been identified that prevent the efficient flow of samples through the NAFRI laboratory, viz.
Lack of the type of instrumentation required to fully operate a soil analytical facility and the very poor state of repair of the equipment actually present,
Insufficient training of personnel in soil analytical techniques and instrument maintenance, and
An inadequate system of sample preparation (drying, sieving, and passage through the laboratory).
Increased efficiency would be gained by converting as many of the laboratory protocols as possible to a centrifuge-based mode of operation. By conducting extractions in plastic tubes, samples are compactly handled in racks, shaking of samples is simplified; separation of soil and solution is rapid and easy, as is post-analysis clean-up.
In the short term, the purchase of three instruments would greatly improve output, viz.
Bench-top centrifuge (16 x 50ml tubes)
Atomic absorption spectrophotometer
UV/VIS Spectrophotometer with flow-cell accessory
Within the limited budget, additional items that would also facilitate sample through-put in this laboratory would include:
Vortex mixer
Semi-micro Markham still with steam generator
pH sensor for the Jenway pH meter
2 x top-pan balances reading to 2 decimal places
Distilled water generator
Large diam. 2mm stainless steel sieve
It is highly desirable that laboratory personnel acquire more expertise in the understanding of soil chemical processes and why analyses are performed in a certain way, and also be able to judge whether currently selected protocols are the most suitable to provide solutions to the problems at hand. This expertise could be gained by the attendance of one of the Soil Scientists on staff at a Soil Chemistry course conducted at least M.Sc. level. In the short term, however, training need would best be met by inviting an experienced Soil Chemist to work with staff at the laboratory at the time of commissioning of the recommended equipment items.
The third bottleneck relating to sample preparation would be removed by a reorganization of the Drying/Preparation shed, its thorough cleaning, and by the employment of a junior (High School graduate) staff member who would be trained in all aspects of soil sample preparation and who would be responsible for the maintenance of this area.
In the medium term, it will be necessary to totally refurbish the main laboratory area by re-surfacing laboratory benches, substituting wooden furnishings and fittings with termite-resistant materials, replacing plumbing and electrical supply, refitting the balance and instrument rooms as purpose-oriented facilities. The floor level should be raised while re-tiling to provide a more comfortable bench height. Similar improvements also apply to the service wing, along with replacement of fume cupboards. Consideration should be given to the construction of an office building adjacent to the main laboratory to accommodate senior laboratory management and analytical staff.
This report discusses a rationale for providing soil and plant analytical services to end-users, and suggests a range of analyses and additional equipment, as well as personnel attributes that would be required to effect a more ambitious development in the medium term.
As part of medium-term planning, consideration could be given to the concept of developing a country-wide network of analytical facilities comprising a National Laboratory and a number (3-4) smaller Regional Laboratories, the latter being based on commodity or simply geographical priorities. Importantly, efficiency over a range of aspects would be gained by standardizing protocols and equipment, and the analytical laboratory at the National University of Laos (NUoL), Department of Agriculture could be linked to be a source of potential employees with experience in network instrumentation.
The above networking concept could be trialled using the NAFRI, Rice Research Centre, and NUoL laboratories, and suggestions for seeking ACIAR support to develop and implement this idea are presented as a series of Recommendations in Section 6 of this Report.

Finish Date

30/11/2011

Extension Start Date

01/12/2011

Commissioned Organisation: 

CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Australia

Commissioned Organisation

CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Australia

Extension Finish Date

29/02/2012

Overview Collaborators

  • National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Laos

ACIAR Research Program Manager

Dr Gamini Keerthisinghe

Collaborating Institutions

National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Laos

Project Budget

$72,850.00

Grant Report Value

$80135.00

Grant Report Recipient

CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences

Grant Report Recipient Post Code

4001

Grant Report Finish Date

29/02/2012

Integrating forage legumes into the maize cropping systems of West Timor

Project Leader

Mr Neal Dalgliesh

Email

neal.dalgliesh@csiro.au

Fax

07 4688 1193

Phone

07 4688 1376

Project Country

Project ID: 

LPS/2006/003

Start Date

01/10/2006

Reference Number

BW-203101-64036

Project Type

Bilateral

Project Status

Active

Finish Date

30/09/2009

Extension Start Date

01/10/2009

Commissioned Organisation: 

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

Commissioned Organisation

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

Extension Finish Date

31/12/2012

Overview Collaborators

  • Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, NTT, Indonesia
  • Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Australia

ACIAR Research Program Manager

Dr Peter Horne

Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

Year 1

Objective 1
The first 12 months of the project have seen significant progress in all three objective areas. The program to evaluate forage legume species with potential for integration into the maize based farming systems has resulted in the identification of a set of plants which will now be taken forward into on-farm assessment during the 2007/08 season. These include Centrosema pascuorum, Clitoria ternatea, Dolichos lab lab, Macroptilium bracteatum, Desmanthus virgatus and Stylosanthes hamata. Whilst biomass production varies between sites and soil types the highest yielding species (Centrosema pascuorum and Dolichos lab lab) indicate the potential, producing in the range of 1000-4000 kg/ha dry matter in approx. 100 days. Whilst it is too early to gauge the impact of this production on nitrogen fixation it can be expected that there will be substantial contribution to nitrogen supply to a subsequent maize production. Whilst production from some other species matched the above levels the impact of disease or insect damage resulted in their exclusion from further evaluation at this time. Legume selection is both a result of identification of appropriate species through routine agronomic assessment, and farmer feedback on potential for system integration.

A critical component of developing forage legumes for NTT is to ensure that forage production becomes self reliant in terms of seed supply. This milestone has been reached during the first year with sufficient locally grown seed now available for immediate research needs and for the establishment of a more commercially based seed production activity which is planned to commence during the 2007/08 season.

Objective 2
Studies have commenced to evaluate the suitability of, and strategies for use of, the forage legumes within the Bali cattle management system in NTT. One of the major aims of developing use of fodder legumes is to provide continuity of supply of high quality fodder during periods when supply is currently limited, namely at the end of the dry season (September-November). Forage legumes provide an opportunity to use currently under-utilised stored soil moisture at the end of the wet season to grow fodder for later dry season use. The first on-station feeding trial has been completed, evaluating the live weight gain, feed intake and digestibility of Centrosema pascuorum, Clitoria ternatea, local Desmodium and Leucaena leucocephala (Tarramba) when fed to six month old weaned Bali calves. Whilst animal feeding data analysis is yet to be completed indications are that some forage legume species will contribute significantly to live weight gains but whether at the same level as Leucaena remains to be seen.

Current animal feeding research is focused on the evaluation of feed quality of crop residues (particularly maize and mung bean stover and rice bran) as well as the overall value of the supplementation of these residues with quantities of legume material. Work during 2007/08 will focus on:
Sequential feeding of a range of legumes as they come on stream during the dry season
In-village evaluation of fodder quality and animal liveweight gains
The development of systems to store the feed for late dry season utilisation.

Objective 3
The third objective of the project is to gain both an understanding of how representative the collaborating villages are of West Timorese society generally, to benchmark current practice and to monitor practice change over time. Benchmarking surveys have been undertaken in all of the collaborating villages. These surveys function to underpin understanding of the people and their farming systems with which we are working as well as a basis to build upon over time through continuing evaluation. These data are used to inform researchers on progress and impact as well as providing research direction and identification of potential challenges before they become major issues. This type of evaluation also provides a facility for the farmers to provide input into the research process ie participatory research.

Year 2

The identification of underutilised soil water remaining at maize harvest, supplemented by late wet season rainfall, as resources for forage legumes production during the dry season has major implications for both animal and cereal crop production in the semi-arid cropping systems of West Timor. Research to date indicates that the forages have the potential to provide high quality supplementary feeding to livestock, particularly in the late dry season and supplement nitrogen supply to subsequent maize crops through fixation.
The first objective has been to identify and trial appropriate legumes within the farming system. Six legumes (Centrosema pascuorum, Clitoria ternatea, Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium bracteatum, Stylosanthes guianensis and Stylosanthes seabrana) were selected during the 2006/07 season on their biophysical attributes and the ability to fit within the existing farming system. It was shown that substantial quantities of forage could be produced over the dry season. At Biloto village (Timor Tengah Selatan regency) maximum biomass production for the annual species, Centrosema pascuorum (3.6 t DM/ha) and Lablab purpureus (4.3 t DM/ha) was achieved in 94 days (February sowing) whilst Clitoria ternatea continued to grow through the dry season producing 3.8 t DM/ha in 197 days. The perennial species Stylosanthes guianensis and Stylosanthes seabrana were slow to establish but produced 6.4 t and 9.7 t DM/ha in 197 days (3rd September).
These data support the hypotheses that legumes can be grown in the dry season on stored soil water. Characterisation of soil water holding capacity at trial locations found that the clays (Vertisols and Inceptisols) stored between 160 and 180 mm of water for crop use, whilst the clay loams (Alfisols), 140 mm. At the time of legume sowing in February the soil at Biloto was at field capacity (180 mm plant available water), 72 days later, by which time the legume Clitoria ternatea had produced 1.7 t DM/ha of biomass, there was still 145 mm of water remaining. During the following 130 days (from early May to early September) this water contributed to the production of an additional 2.1 t DM/ha.
During the 2007/08 wet season research has concentrated on integration of the legumes into the cropping system, either as relay crops after maize or as part of a longer term rotational sequence. Whilst this study will continue into the 08/09 season early results are encouraging. Relay cropped legumes have established well under the maize, and rotation trials have been established using both annual and perennial species. Results from a rotation trial established on the 06/07 legume evaluation site at Kakaniuk (Belu regency) during the 07/08 season are providing support to the idea that legumes can contribute to maize nitrogen supply. Whilst other legumes contributed sufficient nitrogen in one dry season to increase maize grain yield by around 1 t/ha, Clitoria ternatea fixed sufficient to increase grain yield by 2.6 t/ha and stover by 4.1 t DM/ha when compared to the maize control.
Seed production has been increased during the 2007/08 season with over 4.5 ha of a range of species being produced by farmers in three regencies. The aim is to develop self sufficiency in seed supply and to develop a group of farmers and extension personnel experienced in seed production. The increase in production area and the recent agreement by the extension agency DINAS to purchase and distribute seed in Belu regency are positive steps towards achieving these goals.
Preliminary results from on-station animal studies indicate that feeding 6 month old weaned Bali calves conserved annual forage legumes would result in live weight gains greater than those reported in recent dry season village studies where crop residues were fed alone. While the growth rates were not as high as for calves fed Leucaena leucocephala, they do demonstrate a role for forage legumes in the cattle production system. The conservation and utilisation of stored forage legumes for late dry season feeding to growing calves or bulls is expected to be a viable option to supplement the current feed gap. This will be tested during village feeding trials planned for the late dry season (September 2008) in which forage legumes will be fed in conjunction with low quality crop residues including corn stover.
Socioeconomic benchmarking and longitudinal evaluation of farmer and researcher attitudes to the research and proposed interventions continues. Survey of participants in a project sponsored forage workshop (Kupang, November 2007) showed strong interest from farmers in the legumes, Clitoria ternate and Lablab purpureus, and in future involvement in legume seed production. Labour availability and technical support for seed production and legume management were cited as the main constraints to future expansion. The next round of longitudinal evaluation will commence in July 2008 and will include the first attempt at recording the impact of ad-hoc extension on the wider adoption of the technologies in the West Timorese farming community.

Year 3

The identification of annual and semi-perennial forage legumes adapted to the West Timor semi-arid tropical environment has provided the opportunity to increase food security of both the human population and their livestock through modification of the traditional maize based farming system. Whilst >1000mm of annual rainfall is common in West Timor the majority falls during the relatively short wet season (~4 months). This is followed by a long dry season in which food becomes scarce, which in the most extreme cases, results in starvation amongst the human population. The main factors attributing to food supply imbalance are variability in climate, farm size, labour constraints, poor agronomic practice and lack of capital to resource increased production.
Whilst inputs such as inorganic fertiliser could contribute to increased wet season crop production most farmers do not have the capacity to purchase such inputs nor the 'systems skills' with which to use them. Farmers are also keen to participate in the lucrative live cattle export market which exists with western Indonesia. This market provides them access to the cash economy, however daily animal live weight gains are generally low due to the quality and quantity of forages available for feeding, resulting in animals being slow to achieve marketable weight.
The identification of the presence of unutilised soil water at maize harvest, supplemented by late wet season rainfall, provides an opportunity to increase the productive capacity of the farming system. The introduction of forage legumes, able to utilise these resource results in an additional crop being added to the system, grown at a time of year when lands generally remain fallow. The legumes, Clitoria ternatea, Centrosema pascuorum and Lablab purpureus, identified by collaborating farmers as having appropriate traits for inclusion in their farming system, are able to be grown as either relay crops (sown into the maize sward) or in rotation with maize, contributing to food security through increased forage supply for animals and potentially, improved nitrogen (N) supply to subsequent maize crops.
Research to date shows that legume yields of 2 to 5 t/ha Dry Matter (DM) are achievable when sown at the commencement of the wet season and grown in rotation with maize. This system is appropriate in areas where land is available for legume production that is additional to that being used to produce maize in a particular season. Yields of legumes grown under relay conditions were lower that those grown in rotation (1.2 and 1.4 t/ha DM in the 07/08 season), a result of competition for water resources with the maturing maize crop. Biomass produced through relay or rotation is then available to supplement cattle forage supply. A hand operated baler has been developed to efficiently bale the harvested and dried legumes for storage and feeding during the late dry season, the time of year when locally available feed resources are scarce. A village based feeding trial conducted in Usapinonot indicated that weaned Bali calves supplemented with forage legumes, at approximately 15 g DM/kg live weight/d, throughout the dry season (April to November) grew at 0.23 kg/d compared to 0.31 kg/d for animals supplemented with an equivalent amount of Leucaena and 0.12 kg/d for animals maintained under the prevailing management and feeding practices, over the same period.
Improved maize nutrition resulting from the fixing of atmospheric N by the legumes provides farmers with the opportunity to increase the yield of their most important food security crop (ie maize) without a major financial outlay on the purchase of inorganic fertilisers. Recent research has concentrated on the quantification of this contribution and the potential to 'top up' N supply through the additional use of organic fertilisers, such as manure, or lower rates of inorganic fertiliser, the purchase of which is within the reach of some farmers. Visual observation of trials undertaken at the villages of Oebola and Usapinonot during the 2008/09 wet season showed maize crops with higher yield potential when grown after the forage legumes, although the actual impact on yield is yet to be quantified with the analysis of the season's research data. It is anticipated that the provision of these data will allow the quantification of the contribution of legumes to maize N supply and the impact of additional application of manure or Urea on yield. It is planned to develop 'rules of thumb' based on these data which will allow farmers to make their own decisions on maize nutrition based on the previous cropping history of their land, whether forage legumes formed part of that system and their attitude to the risk associated with investment in fertiliser.

Year 4

The identification of annual and semi-perennial forage legumes, adapted to the Eastern Indonesian semi-arid tropical environment, has provided the opportunity to increase food security through modification of the traditional maize based farming system. Whilst >1000 mm of annual rainfall is common in West Timor the majority falls during a relatively short wet season of around 4 months duration. This is followed by a long dry season in which food security becomes a major concern to subsistence farmers. Poor agronomic practice and the inability of farmers to afford inputs such as fertiliser often results in sub-optimal yields of maize. Likewise animal ownership, seen as a means of farmer participation in the cash economy, is limited by the high cost of initial investment and the often limited availability of quality forage for year round animal feeding. Consequently the identification of a number of forage legumes, well adapted to the environment and able to be sown in relay or rotation with maize have the potential to impact on the food security of the province.
Legume evaluation has identified three forage legumes which are agronomically suited and accepted by farmers for inclusion in the existing farming system. Due to the dry finish of the 2007/08 wet season, on-farm research yields of Clitoria ternatea, Centrosema pascuorum and Lablab purpureus varied between 2 and 5 t/ha dry matter (DM) when grown in rotation with maize and 1.2 to 1.4 t/ha DM when grown in relay, with the latter yields impacted by competition for soil water from the maturing maize crop. Feeding trials undertaken in the village of Usapinonot during the 2008 dry season showed that cattle fed forage legumes as a component of their diet (at a daily rate of 15g DM/kg animal live weight over >200 days) gained weight at a rate of 250 g/day, an increase of 100 g/day compared to those fed local forages. Animals supplemented with the browse legume Leucaena leucocephala achieved daily live weight gains of 320 g.
The 2008/09 wet season provided the first opportunity to field test forage legume potential to contribute to subsequent maize production through increased nitrogen supply. In the village of Oebola maize grain yields after relay cropped Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum increased by ~700 kg/ha (from 2.6 to 3.4 t/ha) and stover yield by 1 t/ha (from 3.4 to 4.4 t/ha), compared to a sole maize rotation. Whilst maize yields in the village of Usapinonot were low and variable, a small response in grain yield (from 600 to 800 kg/ha grain) to the relay cropping of Clitoria ternatea has had significant impact on the farming community. The yield increase, in conjunction with the farmers' experience of feeding legumes to cattle, gained through involvement in the 2008 feeding trials, is leading to systems change at the individual and community levels. A leading farmer recently intercropped Clitoria ternatea with maize over an area of 1600 m2. As well as being expected to produce significant quantities of maize, this area has supplied quality forage for animal feeding during the wet and early dry seasons with the expectation that supplies will continue until the mid-dry (August). To support the increasing cattle numbers in the village, leaders have developed the aspirational goal of developing 5 ha of forage legume area over the next 5 years. This is a direct result of the need of farmers for additional forage to enable participation in an Indonesian government initiative to increase herd numbers through support of village farmer groups.
In the village of Tobu the farmer group have developed an integrated system where cattle are fed a mix of forage legumes (intercropped with maize) and improved grasses. The manure is used to produce biogas for home use before being used to fertilise maize and vegetables. In the 2009 dry season the farmer group also harvested ~50 kg of Clitoria ternatea seed for sale to the project and to other local farmers. The system, based on the feeding of quality legumes and grasses to cattle, has been so successful during the last year that the farmer group have been able to utilise excess forage and space in their feedlot to offer an animal finishing service to their neighbours.
Whilst the original project concept was for farmers to use legumes for late dry season forage supplementation, farmers in these examples have modified use to fit local needs. The legumes are intercropped with maize and the forage material used for wet and early to mid dry season feeding, relying on browse legumes such as leucaena for later dry season feeding.
Whilst research is showing that forage legumes do have a place in the maize based farming systems of West Timor, and there are some signs of commencement of adoption, future project activity is focussing on testing the opportunities for legumes in other farming systems and agro-climatological regions of Eastern Indonesia. During the 2009/10 wet season research has commenced on the integration of forage legumes into the rice and maize based farming systems on the island of Flores. Village selection is based on identified drivers of adoption including animal ownership, a need for quality forage, low cereal crop yields and support from local research and extension agencies.

Collaborating Institutions

Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, NTT, Indonesia
Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Australia

Overview Objectives

In West Timor, Indonesia, maize is a major component of the traditional food resource. But yields are poor due to inadequate crop nutrition and crop husbandry, and variable climate. Relay cropping of high-biomass forage legumes during the late wet season, when water and nutrient use by maize is declining, has potential to improve soil nutrient availability for maize crops grown in the following wet season and to supply quality forage for animal production during the subsequent dry season. This project will evaluate forage legumes for integration into maize cropping and assess their potential as dry season fodder to lift animal production. Socio-economic information gathered from participating farmers will assist in determining technology acceptability, potential broader impacts and extension strategies associated with the use of forage legumes.

Project Budget

$773,192.00

Grant Report Value

$850511.00

Grant Report Recipient

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

Grant Report Recipient Post Code

4350

Grant Report Finish Date

31/12/2012

Grant Report Start Date

02/09/2006

Developing options to mainstream climate adaptation into farming systems in Cambodia, Laos, Bangladesh and India

Project Leader

Dr Christian Roth

Email

christian.roth@csiro.au

Fax

07 3214 2308

Phone

07 3833 5732

Project Country

Project Coordinator Phone

(02) 6217 0510
0419 427278

Project Outcomes

The study was carried out by CSIRO through its Climate Adaptation Flagship, in collaboration with a range of partner organisations in the four target countries. It led to recommendations to ACIAR in relation to future investment into farm-level adaptation research, extracted from the review of:
existing knowledge with respect to projected climate change and its likely impacts
key priorities and policies relevant to adaptation to climate change
current donor funded activities
extension and agro-meteorological services in each country
the current knowledge base with respect to farm level adaptation.
These recommendations were clustered into seven domains that are generally applicable to all four countries, followed by a set of country-specific considerations. Those domains are:
climate science research priorities
improving the assessment of climate change impacts on rice-based farming systems
research to underpin government and donor supported adaptation programs
understanding adaptive capacity as the base for developing technical adaptation options
enhancing the role of farming systems research in selecting and evaluating farm level adaptation options
research into improved water management as a key to buffering climate impacts
strengthening the capacity of information delivery systems
Whilst most of the recommendations are relevant to all four countries studied, the balance and emphasis across the recommendations vary between each of the countries - depending on ACIAR country priorities, opportunities to link with other donor projects and the level of research capacity in country.
In Cambodia and Lao PDR it is proposed that ACIAR's adaptation research portfolio should focus on assessing adaptive capacity to inform local-level choice and testing of crop, nutrient and water (irrigation) based adaptation techniques. This assessment should form the basis for more general adaptation strategies to underpin national and provincial planning and policy-making.
Bangladesh offers the best prospects for the further refining, testing and validating of an extended APSIM-ORYZA model (a new functionality developed in the APSIM framework to simulate rice production) because it is possible to draw on several high quality datasets not available elsewhere - this is deemed the highest priority for ACIAR's climate adaptation portfolio. There are other possibilities for addressing salinity intrusion and flooding in south-western Bangladesh and mitigating the impact of drought in north-western Bangladesh.
In India, based on stakeholder feedback, a clear preference is given to further refining the use of seasonal climate forecasting in farmer decision-making and using this as an entry point to adaptation.

Project ID: 

LWR/2008/015

Start Date

01/12/2008

Project Coordinator Fax

(02) 6217 0501

Reference Number

CR-202506-86737

Project Type

Other

Project Status

Concluded

Final Progress Report

Climate change is impacting throughout Asia, with shifts in rainfall patterns, changing temperature regimes and increased climate variability. Since many Asian economies depend more on agriculture than those of developed countries, and have less resilient institutions, they will be more heavily affected by climate change. The poorest farmers bear the brunt of climate change because they live in the more vulnerable areas. Changes in the quantity and timing of rainfall due to climate change are likely to be felt more immediately than temperature shifts and as such require more immediate attention. Climate change impact is likely to be exacerbated where policy environments and capacity to respond are weak.

The impacts of climate change will amplify the current food security crisis.

In response to this ACIAR took a decision in 2008 to establish a dedicated Climate Change Initiative. This new initiative is to proceed in two stages. The first stage of the initiative will emphasise farm level adaptation to climate change, with an emphasis on more efficient use of water resources in Cambodia, Lao PDR, Bangladesh and Andhra Pradesh in India. This scoping study was commissioned by ACIAR to underpin the design of the first stage of the Climate Change Initiative, and the objectives of the scoping study were to:
Assess the constraints and opportunities to climate adaptation at the farm level in the four target countries
Assess the ability of selected farming systems modelling tools to adequately capture biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of rice-based cropping and mixed crop-livestock systems prevalent in the target
Develop benchmarking methods and data collection (survey) protocols to underpin a framework to assess impacts of adaptation

The study was carried out by CSIRO through its Climate Adaptation Flagship, in collaboration with a range of partner organisations in the above four countries. Extensive consultations with key government and non-government stakeholder organisations as well as with relevant international and national research institutions were carried out in the course of several scoping missions. Awareness raising and planning workshops were also held during each mission. A framework to benchmark adaptive capacity was developed and piloted in Bangladesh and Andhra Pradesh.
Recommendations to ACIAR in relation to future investment into farm level adaptation research were extracted from the review of:
Existing knowledge with respect to projected climate change and its likely impacts
Key priorities and policies relevant to adaptation to climate change
Current donor funded activities
Extension and agro-meteorological services in each country
The current knowledge base with respect to farm level adaptation.

These recommendations were clustered into seven domains that are generally applicable to all four countries, followed by a set of country specific considerations.

1. Climate science research priorities
Better understanding and managing for current climate variability at local scales should be considered as a more important entry point for farm level climate adaptation for ACIAR than allocating effort to refining national level climate projections.
A more sophisticated statistical analysis of historical climate datasets should be undertaken to determine characteristics of climate variability (all four countries) and to determine/confirm trends in climate change (Cambodia, Lao PDR).
Explore the utility of statistical downscaling methods to 'localise' climate change projections and apply these methods in regions or locations of interest and where more detailed farm level adaptation research is envisaged.
Development of innovative ways of communicating climate uncertainty and variability, tailored to the different communication skills and needs of policy makers, government and non-government extensionists and smallholder farmers.
Evaluation of seasonal climate forecasts currently generated in Cambodia, Lao PDR and Bangladesh with respect to their current forecasting skill and with respect to options for improving their reliability and extending their lead times.

2. Improving the assessment of climate change impacts on rice based farming systems
Future impact assessments need to better reflect local conditions of farming systems and to the extent possible take into account 'local' climate variability and climate change.
More emphasis should be given on assessing opportunities and avenues to maximise positive impacts of climate change.
A scoping study should be considered by ACIAR to assess the direct and indirect impacts of climate change on livestock performance.
ACIAR should continue to invest in the further development of APSIM and in particular support its extension to fully capture rice crops in rice-based cropping systems.
In the context of wider application in food security and livestock intensification research, ACIAR should consider supporting the redesign of IAT to achieve greater versatility and more user friendliness.

3. Research to underpin government and donor supported adaptation programmes
ACIAR's investment in climate adaptation research should consider targeting the gap between national scale climate change vulnerability and impact assessments, and the demonstration of adaptation interventions at the household and community level.
The ACIAR emphasis on adaptation research should be to demonstrate the development of multi-scale adaptation strategies that enable policy makers to deliver more effective climate adaptation programs elsewhere.
ACIAR should ensure its future adaptation research projects are explicitly linked to other donor funded adaptation projects where there are clear opportunities for outscaling of adaptation strategies and where there is a high likelihood of application of outputs generated by the ACIAR projects.
As a key input to policy formulation and the design of adaptation programmes, ACIAR should consider supporting research that also determines the limitations to adaptation.

4. Understanding adaptive capacity as the base for developing technical adaptation options
A high priority should be accorded to social research aimed at understanding adaptive capacity in conjunction with the evaluation of technical adaptation measures.
A focus of social research should be the development of more rigorous tools and frameworks to assess adaptive capacity at a range of scales (household to national policy levels).
Greater emphasis should be placed on supporting research into the integration of social and biophysical sciences by using the insights obtained from the adaptive capacity analysis to inform the choices of technical adaptation options requiring further evaluation.
Adaptation research should be underpinned by the quantification of the financial and economic costs and benefits of adaptation and a determination of the incentives that will encourage smallholder farmers to adapt to longer term climate change.

5. Enhancing the role of farming systems research in selecting and evaluating farm level adaptation options
Any evaluation of adaptive farm management practices (crop density and planting dates, choice of alternate crops or varieties, nutrient and water management, cultural practices, livestock nutrition and management, etc.) should be conducted using farming systems models that are capable of capturing farming practice realities and that are used in a participatory mode, soliciting farmer input to scenario definition and output assessment.
Capacity building in participatory farming systems modelling and in depth training of appropriately selected and institutionally supported researchers should be undertaken in conjunction with farming systems modeling to evaluate farm level adaptation options.
Crop and farming systems scenario modelling should be carried out to inform the prioritisation of breeding programs developing the next generation of climate-resilient crop varieties.
The evaluation of farm level adaptation options should also take into account their efficiency in terms of unit use of input factors (e.g. water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency, fuel/energy use per unit biomass produced) to ensure that adaptation does not inadvertently lead to future maladaptation.

6. Research into improved water management as a key to buffering climate impacts
ACIAR should commission a scoping study to assess the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of government and donor supported implementation of integrated drainage networks to mitigate the impacts of flooding.
A more systematic assessment of ground water resources in terms of quantity and quality, and their sustainable use for supplementary irrigation should be carried out in primarily in Cambodia and Lao PDR.
A focus of the climate adaptation research in Bangladesh should be the determination of spatial and temporal dynamics of salinity intrusion as a result of climate change and the implications of these changed dynamics for the adaptation of crop and water management.

7. Strengthening the capacity of information delivery systems
All farm level adaptation research activities should be designed with a significant capacity building component to enhance the skills of government and NGO extension workers in the provision of advice to farmers on farm level adaptation options.
The design of effective dissemination pathways and the packaging of seasonal forecast information into farmer friendly advisories should be piloted in Bangladesh and Lao PDR.

Whilst most of the above recommendations are relevant to all four countries studied, the balance and emphasis across these recommendations varies between each of the countries, depending on ACIAR country priorities, opportunities to link with other donor projects and the level of research capacity in country.

In Cambodia and Lao PDR it is proposed that the focus of ACIAR's adaptation research portfolio should be on assessing adaptive capacity to inform local level choice and testing of crop, nutrient and water (irrigation) based adaptation techniques as the basis for the development of more general adaptation strategies to underpin national and provincial planning and policy making. In Cambodia this should be located in Prey Veng and Svay Rieng, while in Lao PDR the proposed geographic focus is Savannakhet Province.
Bangladesh offers the best prospects for the further refining, testing and validating of an extended APSIM-ORYZA model because it is possible to draw on several high quality datasets not available elsewhere; so the further development of APSIM-ORYZA as a critical enabling tool to analyse adaptation scenarios is seen as the highest priority for ACIAR's climate adaptation portfolio in Bangladesh. Resources permitting, there are also two additional project options which revolve around addressing salinity intrusion and flooding in the SW of Bangladesh and mitigating the impact of drought in the NW of Bangladesh.

In India, based on stakeholder feedback, a clear preference is given to further refining the use of seasonal climate forecasting in farmer decision making and using this as an entry point to adaptation. These actions should be underpinned by a better understanding of adaptive capacity and a stronger level of engagement with policy stakeholders at central and state government levels.

Finish Date

30/09/2009

Commissioned Organisation: 

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

Project Coordinator Email

skerritt@aciar.gov.au

Commissioned Organisation

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

Overview Collaborators

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Mirko Stauffacher

    Program Areas

    Overview Objectives

    Climate change impact is likely to be exacerbated where policy environments and capacity to respond are weak, and will amplify the current food security crisis. This is the case in many Asian economies that heavily depend on agriculture. ACIAR took a decision in 2008 to establish a dedicated Climate Change Initiative designed to proceed in two stages. Stage 1 will initially focus on farm-level adaptation research in India (particularly Andhra Pradesh state), Bangladesh, Cambodia and Laos, where there are considerable opportunities to build on past and ongoing ACIAR farming systems projects.
    This small research activity facilitated the scoping and design phase of Stage 1, leading up to a 4.5-year program scheduled to commence in October 2009. The scoping team members assessed the constraints and opportunities to climate adaptation at the farm level in the four target countries. They also assessed, in the context of climate variability and climate change, the ability of selected farming systems modelling tools to adequately capture biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of rice-based cropping and mixed crop-livestock systems prevalent in the target regions. Finally, they developed benchmarking methods and data collection (survey) protocols, providing a framework to assess impacts of adaptation. It was anticipated that this framework would undergo further development and testing in selected countries as part of the study.

    Project Budget

    $299,824.00

    Grant Report Value

    $329806.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    4067

    Grant Report Finish Date

    30/09/2009

    Grant Report Start Date

    02/10/2008

    Assessing the feasibility of farmers managing climate related crop production risk in Andhra Pradesh, India

    Project Leader

    Dr Zvi Hochman

    Email

    Zvi.Hochman@csiro.au

    Fax

    07 3214 2308

    Phone

    07 3214 2630

    Project Country

    Project Outcomes

    The project focused on two villages with contrasting rainfall pattern, farming practices, soil types and availability of water resources for irrigating crops. District-specific agro-advisory bulletins were prepared and disseminated twice weekly to these villages via NGOs. The research team assessed quantitatively the accuracy of medium-range forecasts and qualitatively evaluated the impacts on the village farmers of disseminating this information.
    An analysis of climate variability based on daily meteorological data between1965 and 2007 showed that climatic variability can have a large influence on potential crop production. The project investigated the discrepancy between the meteorological definition of the date of the break of the Monsoon and the agronomic rule for time of sowing of crops. The team found this difference exceeded 21 days in over 30% of seasons. Farmers' lack of knowledge of the agronomic rule for sowing resulted in significant economic losses in 2008 and an increased awareness of this rule has been a documented project achievement.
    Soils' Plant Available Water Capacity (PAWC) and soil chemistry were characterised at seven on-farm research sites, and 10 farmers' crops (paddy rice, cotton and maize) were monitored for use in validation of the cropping systems simulator APSIM. Once the strengths and weaknesses of the model were understood, the team conducted a series of 'what-if?' simulations to examine the merits of alternative management options for the monitored crops over the previous 42 years. These simulations identified wasted irrigations and flagged the potential for improving cotton crop yields and yield stability by triggering applications of supplemental irrigation on the basis of plant-available soil water, rather than the currently recommended trigger based on days after sowing.
    Participating village farmers now know a great deal more about managing crops in response to seasonal conditions. The project has also served as a model for disseminating agro-advisories to villages in AP. Future impacts of the project on efficient use of water resources will depend on the success of follow-up on-farm research on the feasibility of implementing soil water deficit based irrigation of cotton crops. Successful adaptation depends on policy settings as well as on biophysical factors. Current policy settings in AP encourage high production levels but remove incentives for efficient use of fertilisers and groundwater resources.
    The team identified a need to improve the skill level of the medium-range weather forecast used in the agromet advisories, and to develop more skilful longer-range forecast products so that farmers respond more strategically to climate variability. Until more reliable extended-range and seasonal forecasts can be delivered, it will be necessary to place greater emphasis on climatology as the best guide to the likely outcomes of management options. This will require ready access to data from a network of long-term weather stations with good state wide coverage.
    The project team highlighted the need to improve the capability of existing cropping and farming systems models to represent rice-based farming systems in rainfed areas. Another recommendation was to develop the local capacity to use simulation models - including both training in the use of simulation models and in the capacity to monitor the crop and soil parameters needed to set up simulation and validation.
    Simulation of a cotton cropping system showed that irrigation on a threshold soil water level has the potential to increase income stability compared with the current practice of irrigating on a fixed interval. Given groundwater supply limitations in Bairanpally and generally throughout AP, the technical, logistic and social feasibility of implementing such a system should be explored further. Similarly, options for more efficient use of groundwater for crop production should be investigated in a whole-farm and whole-village context, taking into account the range of crops grown and their use of deep wells, bores, tanks and canal water resources.
    The project team also recommended that the focus of further research be broadened to include adaptation to climate change.

    Project ID: 

    LWR/2006/073

    Start Date

    01/02/2008

    Reference Number

    CR-202208-53648

    Project Type

    Other

    Project Status

    Concluded

    Final Progress Report

    Farms in the state of Andhra Pradesh AP are vulnerable to climate variability because kharif crop yields vary in response to the variable timing of the commencement and conclusion of the rainy season, prolonged dry spells within the rainy season and flood damage to crops from events of high rainfall intensity. The project undertook an investigation of the feasibility of improving Andhra Pradesh farmers' capacity to manage climate related crop production risk.
    The project focused on two villages with contrasting rainfall pattern, farming practices, soil types and availability of water resources for irrigating crops. District-specific agro-advisory bulletins were prepared and disseminated to these villages via NGOs twice weekly. We assessed quantitatively the accuracy of medium range forecasts and qualitatively evaluated the impacts on the village farmers of disseminating this information.
    An analysis of climate variability based on daily meteorological data between1965 and 2007 showed that climatic variability can have a large influence on potential crop production. The project investigated the discrepancy between the meteorological definition of the date of the break of the Monsoon and the agronomic rule for time of sowing of crops. We found this difference exceeded 21 days in over 30% of seasons. Farmers' lack of knowledge of the agronomic rule for sowing resulted in significant economic losses in 2008 and an increased awareness of this rule has been a documented project achievement.
    Soils' Plant Available Water Capacity (PAWC) and soil chemistry were characterised at seven on-farm research sites and ten farmers' crops (paddy rice, cotton and maize) were monitored for use in validation of the cropping systems simulator APSIM. Once the strengths and weaknesses of the model were understood, we conducted a series of "what-if" simulations to examine the merits of alternative management options for the monitored crops over the previous 42 years. These simulations identified wasted irrigations and a potential for improving cotton crop yields and yield stability by triggering applications of supplemental irrigation on the basis of a plant available soil water threshold rather than the currently recommended trigger based on days after sowing.
    The project has had a documented impact on participating village farmers' knowledge about managing crops in response to seasonal conditions. It has also served as a model for disseminating agro-advisories to villages in AP. Future impacts of the project on efficient use of water resources will depend on the success of follow-up on-farm research on the feasibility of implementing soil water deficit based irrigation of cotton crops. Successful adaptation is dependent on policy settings as well as on biophysical factors. Current policy settings in AP encourage high production levels but remove incentives for efficient use of fertilisers and groundwater resources.
    There is a need to improve the skill level of the medium range weather forecast used in the agromet advisories and to develop more skilful longer range forecast products in order to enable farmers to respond more strategically to climate variability. Until more reliable extended range and seasonal forecasts can be delivered it will be necessary to place greater emphasis on climatology as the best guide to the likely outcomes of management options. This will require ready access to data from a network of long term weather stations with good state wide coverage.
    The capability of existing cropping and farming systems models to represent rice-based farming systems in rainfed areas should be further developed and tested. This will require the acquisition of a wide range of soil characterisation data and access to up-to-date long term climate data sets to represent climate variability. Such data is also required for statistical downscaling of climate change projections to enable analysis of future climate change scenarios. The local capacity to use simulation models should also be developed. This includes training in the use of simulation models but also the monitoring of crop and soil parameters that are required to set up simulation and validation.
    Simulation of a cotton cropping system showed that irrigation on a threshold soil water level has the potential to increase income stability compared with the current practice of irrigating on a fixed interval (das). Given groundwater supply limitations in Bairanpally and generally throughout AP, the technical, logistic and social feasibility of implementing such a system should be explored further. Similarly, options for more efficient use of groundwater for crop production should be investigated in a whole farm and whole village context, taking into account the range of crops grown and their use of deep wells, bores, tanks and canal water resources.
    The focus of this project should be broadened to include adaptation to climate change. This would require an ability to conduct climate change based scenario analyses using the models and data deployed in this project in order to identify crops and irrigation management options that may be better adapted to possible future climates.

    Finish Date

    31/05/2009

    Extension Start Date

    01/01/2010

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    31/03/2010

    Overview Collaborators

    • Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India
    • Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, India
    • Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Australia

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Mirko Stauffacher

    Collaborating Institutions

    Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India
    Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, India
    Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Australia

    Program Areas

    Overview Objectives

    In the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) kharif crops are heavily dependent on summer monsoon rains, where the timing and intensity of the rains affects crop yield. The majority of farms in AP are small and marginal, making them very vulnerable to yield reductions. Farmers also lack access to relevant information that might enable them to respond to seasonal conditions. Enabling farmers to utilise seasonal climate forecasting would allow them to respond to seasonal variability. To do this, farmers need a forecasting system that indicates a specific management strategy for the upcoming season, and effective and timely communication of the forecast information. Current agro-meteorological advisories in AP are issued on a bi-weekly basis, and they are relevant to an agro-climatic zone scale which may not be sufficiently relevant at a village level. Also, the information in the advisories may not be necessarily packaged in way relevant to cropping decisions by farmers. The objectives of this project are to evaluate the skill of seasonal climate forecasts to be issued for the 2008 monsoon season, to assess crop management options in response to seasonal scenarios that capture the range of seasonal climatic variability, to develop and evaluate options for effective communication and adoption of climate forecasts and agricultural advisories, and to synthesise and report on options for future research investments into seasonal climate forecasting.

    Project Budget

    $200,627.00

    Grant Report Value

    $220690.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    4067

    Grant Report Finish Date

    31/03/2010

    Grant Report Start Date

    29/01/2008

    Enhancing production and marketing of maize and soybean in north-western Cambodia and production of summer crops in north-eastern Australia

    Project Leader

    Professor Bob Martin

    Email

    bob.martin@une.edu.au

    Fax

    02 6773 3238

    Phone

    02 6773 2745

    Project Country

    Project ID: 

    ASEM/2006/130

    Start Date

    01/05/2008

    Reference Number

    KM-201018-58408

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Active

    Finish Date

    30/04/2011

    Extension Start Date

    01/05/2011

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    University of New England, Australia

    Commissioned Organisation

    University of New England, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    30/04/2012

    Overview Collaborators

    • Industry & Investment NSW, Australia
    • University of Canberra, Australia
    • CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia
    • Cambodia Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Cambodia
    • Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, Cambodia
    • CARE Cambodia, Cambodia
    • Ministry of Commerce, Cambodia
    • University of Melbourne, Australia

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Caroline Lemerle

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    The project ASEM/2006/130 "Enhancing production and marketing of maize and soybean in north-western Cambodia and production of summer crops in north-eastern Australia" commenced in May 2008. The overarching aim of the project is to improve the functioning of the production - marketing system for maize and soybean in north-western Cambodia as a key to increasing cash income, sustainable growth and poverty reduction for smallholder farmers. The project will facilitate the sharing of knowledge and information at all stages of the value chain from farmer to end-user. This will deliver practical benefits including improved food security, increased income, and reduced vulnerability to disruptions for rural poor farmers. In north-western NSW, the aim is to address lack of adoption of conservation farming practices, increase summer crop diversity and to develop strategies for adaptation of farming systems to climate change.
    Eight village clusters were established, four in the district of Samlaut and four in the municipality of Pailin. A total of nineteen trials of improved varieties, rhizobium inoculation of legumes and nitrogen nutrition of maize were successfully completed. The yields of maize, soybean, peanut and mungbean in experimental plots exceeded the predicted maximum yields for Cambodia and were more than double the average farmer yields. The project has identified 6 production technologies to help farmers increase crop yields. The technologies under study are improved varieties, rhizobium inoculation, nitrogen nutrition of maize, crop rotation, reduced tillage and integrated pest management.
    Farmer workshops investigated key socio-economic issues related to adoption of the improved crop technologies. Village workshops were completed in December for 2 villages in each of the Pailin and Samlaut districts. The gross margin budgets from these workshops were presented to the project meeting in Battambang in February 2009. Gross margin budgets were completed for experiments in Samlaut and Pailin. Return on investment calculations were completed for inoculation and nitrogen fertiliser application to maize.
    Based on case studies and interviews of farmers and middlemen, a value chain map was developed for maize in Pailin. Key on-ground issues were identified for each value chain participant (farmer, middleman, silo manager), followed by establishing a suitable case study for the project. A case study was set up in Pailin region based on CARE farmer clusters, supply chains to silo and Thai markets. By far the largest task in the first year was gathering information to map out the supply chains. It has involved extensive farmer and middlemen surveys and interviews as well as visits to observe the different supply chain activities.
    A review of marketing arrangements in the Pailin area revealed that there is essentially a single buyer for upland crops in northwest Cambodia (i.e. CP Foods based in Thailand). The Northwest Agricultural Marketing Association (NAMA) was established as a marketing organization of upland crops and already its members account for about 20% of the crop in that region. NAMA will seek to develop alternative export markets as well as farmer hubs for inputs, outputs and communications. We developed a background paper on NAMA and held two participatory workshops with NAMA members to explore their issues and potential actions. In addition to this work with NAMA we are exploring the possibility to develop a strategic plan for developing farmer associations/cooperatives in the second year of the project. We are also continuing to work with the Ministry of Commerce to carry out research to support the development of the operations of NAMA and its initiative on export market development.
    A SMS communication system (EMCS), developed by Dr Rob Fitzgerald, adopted the open source application Frontline SMS. Worked with the newly formed NAMA to develop the SMS Field Communication System to install a server in Pailin with particular focus on the provision of information (rated top priority by members) and the exchange and sharing of silo association price and market information. A server has also been installed with MJP in Battambang with particular emphasis on basic market information and health alerts.
    Field crop manuals for maize and soybean have been compiled and are currently being translated into Khmer language. Weed and insect field guides have also been compiled and are being translated to Khmer language. These publications will be made available to PDA extension staff and other information providers. The GDA Directorate of Agricultural Extension will also use the publications as resources for production of farmer extension materials. We also plan to liaise with the Royal University of Agriculture and Agricultural Colleges to update curricula on upland crop production and marketing information.

    Year 2

    ASEM/2006/130 commenced in May 2008. The overarching aim of the project is to improve the functioning of the production - marketing system for maize and soybean in north-western Cambodia as a key to increasing cash income, sustainable growth and poverty reduction for smallholder farmers. In north-western NSW, the aim is to develop strategies for adaptation of farming systems to climate variability and climate change.
    Down-scaled future climate scenarios were completed for sorghum in NW NSW and APSIM simulation runs were completed for farming systems options for sorghum. Economic analysis of farmer preferences were completed and submitted for presentation/publication in the Australian Summer Grains Conference June 2010. Linear programming will be used in conjunction with @Risk to analyse the outcomes of farming systems options for adaptation to climate change.
    In Cambodia, the trial and demonstration program in 2009 included improved varieties, rhizobium inoculation of legumes and nitrogen nutrition of maize. In 2009, feedback from farmers highlighted the need for trials on herbicides for weed control in maize and soybean because the cost of labour had become too great to allow for hand-weeding. The production technologies being evaluated now include: improved varieties, rhizobium inoculation, nitrogen nutrition of maize, crop rotation, reduced tillage, integrated pest management and weed management.
    Farmer workshops investigated key socio-economic issues related to adoption of the improved crop technologies - the major issue in 2009 has been the increasing cost of farm labour. In June 2009 the village workshops developed partial budgets for return on investment for the application of nitrogen fertilizer to maize and inoculation of legume seeds with rhizobium. In October 2009 further partial budgets were developed for weeding of crops - hand weeding versus chemical sprays.
    A review of marketing arrangements in northwest Cambodia revealed there is essentially a single buyer for upland crops in the region (CP Foods, Thailand). Thus, Professor Spriggs provided assistance to establish the Northwest Agricultural Marketing Association (NAMA) to improve the marketing arrangements in the region. NAMA is anchored by three major silos (Pailin, Kamrieng and Malai) which are important potential crop marketing hubs for inputs, outputs and communications in the region. An action plan was developed with NAMA with two components: (1) to help NAMA with export market development and (2) to help NAMA develop its vision for the future.
    A SMS service was developed based on a simple, robust framework for contact dissemination which includes the potential for peer-submitted and peer-reviewed content. A prototype system was completed in January 2010, using a more modular architecture and popular open-source software solutions. Field research in February 2010 resulted in a revised focus for the system towards mapping and disseminating information about market players relevant to users. The FrontlineSMS server is being hosted at the Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP).
    Value chain mapping has been completed including a grain trader survey in 2009.These data will add significantly to the knowledge about the farmer/grain trader relationships. A social network analysis (SNA ) was carried out to identify the key actors in the farmer/grain trader network. The main immediate opportunities to address constraints in the value chain include the creation of a farmer's association, a grain trader association and the investigation of grain storage facilities at the farmer and trader level. A farmer association has been established by the CARE Pailin team in cooperation with the local Provincial Department of Agriculture (PDA). Preliminary work has also been done to establish a grain trader (middleman) association. Planning has been in cooperation with the Pailin Department of Commerce (DoC).
    The Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, North-East Thailand was identified as a source of liquid rhizobium and supplies were obtained to provide farmers with inoculants to try out in their own fields in EWS 2010. A TOT activity was developed to assist with the roll out of the technology.
    An illustrated children's book "Jorani and the Green Vegetable Bugs" was published in Khmer language to teach children about integrated pest management (IPM) in upland crops. A pilot activity involved introducing the concept to school directors and teachers; development of a teacher guide; implementation in schools; celebration and public launch. The pilot was a success and further units are being considered for the Life Skills program. The concept will be presented to the MoEYS for endorsement and roll-out to primary schools in Cambodia. Negotiations are now underway to publish a Lao version of the book in collaboration with the Lao/Japanese NGO "Action with Lao Children."

    Collaborating Institutions

    Industry & Investment NSW, Australia
    University of Canberra, Australia
    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia
    Cambodia Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Cambodia
    Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, Cambodia
    CARE Cambodia, Cambodia
    Ministry of Commerce, Cambodia
    University of Melbourne, Australia

    Overview Objectives

    Agriculture supports an estimated 70% of Cambodia's labour force, with increases in productivity having the potential to reduce poverty among the 56% of the rural population living below the poverty line. Crop diversification beyond rice is increasing productivity, partly in response to demand from Thailand. The relative inexperience of Cambodian farmers in growing new crops, especially maize, does present challenges, for example in declining soil fertility. Appropriate agricultural management techniques and technologies will alleviate this decline, but must be delivered with appropriate socio-economic considerations that cater for the whole-of-value chain, from farms to postharvest management. A sustainable model for maize, and farmer-ready technological packages will be developed and delivered to farmers through participatory methods that address relevant social and economic factors, across the whole value chain. In Australia the approach will be adapted to address conservation farming practices and their adoption in north-western NSW.

    Project Budget

    $1,201,215.00

    Grant Report Value

    $1321336.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    University of New England

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    2351

    Grant Report Finish Date

    30/04/2012

    Grant Report Start Date

    08/04/2008

    Related project news

    Scaling-out herd management strategies in crop-livestock systems in Lombok, Indonesia

    Project Leader

    Dr Bruce Pengelly

    Email

    Bruce.Pengelly@csiro.au

    Fax

    07 3214 2308

    Phone

    07 3214 2348

    Project Country

    Project Coordinator Phone

    (02) 6217 0541
    0403 056675

    Project ID: 

    SMAR/2006/096

    Start Date

    01/06/2007

    Project Coordinator Fax

    (02) 6217 0501

    Reference Number

    CH-202809-38658

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Active

    Final Progress Report

    Bali cattle are an important contributor to the Indonesian beef industry and the majority of production comes from smallholder farmers in eastern Indonesia who own 2-4 cattle per household. Improving Bali cattle productivity on these smallholdings is vital not only to the Government's beef self sufficiency targets, but also to improving the economic development of farmers living in its poorest regions.
    This project builds on the success of previous ACIAR projects that have identified productivity constraints in Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB) and developed and successfully tested simple, low risk solutions in both collective and distributed systems. These practices - controlled mating with quality bulls, early weaning, preferential feeding and making better use of existing and introduced forage resources - along with improved kandang infrastructure and hygiene form the foundation of the project.
    A research focus was to better understand the adoption process, particularly how farmers and communities spread information and make decisions about new agricultural practices. In addition, the project team aimed to build capacity and positively influence local and regional institutions associated with livestock management.
    Productivity gains from uptake of project practices include a calving rate of around 90%, with calf survival of around 95% and a calving interval of just over 12 months, which is very close to the project's stated aim of 'one cow, one calf, one year'.
    While herd size across the 36 project kandangs has remained relatively stable, births and sales have increased. Farmers are able to sell animals at a younger age because the weight gain between birth and weaning has increased. In this way, farmers - with limited space in existing kandangs to house new animals and little additional land to grow forages to feed them - are able to increase reproductive potential and convert this to greater throughput and increased sales without overt strain on other resources.
    The project occurred in the context of resource limitations and a key reason for its success has been its ability to understand and address some of these limitations. In addition, the project team played a key role in facilitating improved governance structures, and a broader mandate of operation for kandang groups.
    Although scaling out information from kandang groups was not a priority for the project, natural expansion of project ideas has occurred. Key institutions or activities for the spread of information were the mosque, family networks, use of the project bull and through collective activities such as forage collection.
    Over four hundred satellite farmers (farmers in close proximity to the project kandang groups, but not members of them) took up some of the technology package, and bull services (and hence controlled mating) were the entry point. Satellite farmers generally received less information and were less certain of the value of project practices and how to implement them. While bringing cows for mating provided a good opportunity for discussion, limited information was shared and subsequent adoption was minimal.
    To achieve widespread geographical benefit and impact, replication across an increased number of kandangs seems more viable (or faster) than farmer to farmer interaction over longer distances. Suggested areas of focus include uptake of project principles by local livestock agencies, support for key community players in information transfer, particularly kandang group members and bull keepers, and support for improvements in livestock policy.
    Using data from the precursor project, it was possible to identify significant impacts beyond the usual project length and to focus on changes that have occurred since the end of the project's influence (1.5 years after project close).
    Analysis supported claims that implementation of project practices helped to improve household livelihoods through improved cattle condition increasing the value/price received for cattle, improved availability of forage and associated labour savings and freed labour invested into other income generating activities.
    Although these data reflect impacts felt by farmers in dispersed, rather than collective systems, this information provides an indication of what impacts and changes can be expected by individual farmers (in either system) adopting equivalent practices.
    According to farmers, engagement with the project increased skills and knowledge of improved livestock management practices, and also the social capital of the groups, through increased cohesion, communication and cooperation. In particular, this has resulted in more advantageous engagement with local markets.
    The On Ground Team (OGT) is a group of well trained, and now experienced, field extension workers. A suite of relevant technical skills was developed throughout the project, as well as advanced abilities in problem solving and community engagement.
    One of the greatest achievements by the project team has been its strong influence on relevant regional institutions. Strategic engagement with District and Provincial Dinas and Extension staff and Bappeda staff, along with ongoing support from the Governor's Office and the Bupati of Central Lombok has resulted in important policy linkages and institutional relevance.
    The project resulted in significant capacity and community impacts, with key economic (particularly increased sales) and social (particularly improved motivation and means to work collectively for mutual benefit) impacts felt by over 1100 households.
    Recommendations for future work include: a detailed assessment to track livelihoods and other impacts after project close; an investigation of calf mortality in the project kandangs; further study on when and why cows are being sold; expansion of the project approach to other areas and other farming systems of NTB; and the future use of an OGT model for projects requiring regular and effective community engagement.

    Finish Date

    31/05/2010

    Extension Start Date

    01/06/2010

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Project Coordinator Email

    winter@aciar.gov.au

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    31/12/2011

    Overview Collaborators

    • Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, NTB, Indonesia
    • University of Mataram, Indonesia
    • Livestock Services of Nusa Tenggara Barat Province, Indonesia

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Peter Horne

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    The project is progressing well and is ahead of its proposed schedule. Activities in the first year focused on establishing teams and methodologies, selecting and working with communities in the study region, and creating opportunities for engagement with key farming and institutional stakeholders.

    The project employed 12 On Ground Team (OGT) members and one Project Officer in November 07 after an intensive recruitment process in August and September. The team is an impressive group of recent graduates and recruits with experience in smallholder farming systems and comprises skills in socio-economics, animal management, forage monitoring and smallholder farming, and all have ability in Sasak language.

    The OGT has received theoretical and practical training from Lombok and Australian specialists on an array of topics such as forage assessment, management and monitoring, nursery establishment and maintenance, animal nutrition and health, farming systems and modelling, data management, socio-economics and extension practices. Most OGT training is also attended by local agricultural extension staff from the project's study villages.

    Two students also joined the project in 2008. One is undertaking a Masters degree in forage agronomy and diversity. The other is completing a PhD on the impacts of improving the availability of introduced and local forages on cattle productivity under smallholder conditions, covering aspects of forage composition and quality, preferential feeding and the impact of forage legumes on livestock performance and farmer adoption.

    To ensure effective project coordination, a multi-level team structure was established. The Project Management Team is responsible for operations & coordination; the Project Specialist Team is responsible for technical expertise & training and the On Ground Team is responsible for implementation & extension. A start-up meeting attended by all teams was held in Lombok in November 07.

    In addition, an Advisory Committee was established in November 07, comprising representatives from the local government, BPTP, University of Mataram, Dinas Peternakan, NGOs, CSIRO and the farming community. The Committee's role is to provide overall guidance and advice on the direction and relevance of the project.

    Despite a late start to the project, 12 kandang communities were selected by January 08, in addition to two demonstration or 'training' kandangs. Criteria for selection included cattle population, ownership status and security of the kandang, willingness of the community to participate and scope for adopting improved technology, particularly in terms of labour and land. The OGT completed the compilation of socio-economic and cultural data from the kandang communities in February 08, after developing and trialling a benchmarking survey.

    Ten new kandangs have now been selected for the second year of the project and a similar benchmarking process is underway.

    The project team is using a three-step approach to adoption of livestock technologies, based on farmer perceptions of need and potential for improvement. Step one is improvement of existing kandang facilities and provision of a communal bull (thereby ensuring controlled mating). Community negotiation about renovations was facilitated by the OGT and other team members and renovations were completed by the community in May 08. Renovations commonly include construction of bull and calf pens and improved kandang drainage. Bulls will be purchased and introduced to the kandangs in early June08.

    The second step is improving the forage resource and to this end, small demonstration nurseries have been established by OGT and farmers at each participating kandang to demonstrate new forages, management techniques and aspects of animal nutrition. The third step is the introduction of other breeding management strategies shown to be successful in previous ACIAR projects (eg early weaning and preferential feeding of calves).

    Communication and engagement activities in year one include: hosting international visitors interested in the design and progress of the project; featuring in print media articles in key regional newspapers; producing the first edition of a project newsletter which was distributed to relevant institutions in Lombok, South Sulawesi and Australia; organising or facilitating participating farmer visits to demonstration sites, the university forage nursery and other participating kandangs; and engaging regularly with key regional stakeholders, including the Bupati of Central Lombok, Dinas Peternakan at regional and local levels, Bappeda in Central Lombok and heads of participating and interested villages in the study region.

    Year 2

    Key activities in the second year of the project were community and institutional engagement and implementing improved infrastructure and breeding and feeding practices.

    The final 12 kandangs have been selected for the project, bringing the total for the project to 36. Socio-economic and biophysical benchmarking has now been completed for all project kandangs.

    As in year one, the key components of livestock improvement promoted by the project team were breeding management, improvement of existing kandang facilities and improving forage resources.

    Breeding management activities focused on controlled mating through provision of a bull. All project bulls were purchased by farmers and On-Ground Team (OGTs) by mid-July and sold by end of December. In each kandang a bull keeper was appointed from the group to manage mating and feeding. Over 1000 cows were mated by project bulls between June and December - 58% from project kandangs (91% of the total number of mature females) and 42% from cows in neighbouring farms.

    Infrastructure improvements were implemented by the farmer group after discussions facilitated by the OGTs. Most groups chose to construct a bull pen and improve kandang drainage. The small injection of project funds was a catalyst, and many groups have now contributed significantly more than the project both as in kind and financially and have continued with improvement activities.

    Limited availability of land remains a challenge for establishing adequate forage resources, but there have been encouraging signs this year. Small plots have been established at each study kandang which are used to demonstrate new forages, management techniques and aspects of animal nutrition. Strategies for village-level forage development are being discussed. Requests for additional seedlings and cuttings are prioritised according to how much land individuals are prepared to devote to forage production.

    Training for the OGTs is ongoing and has focussed on implementation of project activities, such as forage development, kandang sanitation, data collection, nutritional requirements and detection of oestrus. Farmer training from an expert in Bogor was facilitated on the use of manure as an organic fertiliser.

    The two project students are progressing well. The Masters student (forage agronomy, diversity and organic practices) has completed lab analyses and is currently collating literature in preparation for writing his thesis. The PhD student (impacts of improving the availability of introduced and local forages on cattle productivity) began data collection in January 09, including botanical composition of offered feed, adoption of new forages and baseline information on pregnant cows and weaned calves to be supplemented with improved forages, particularly tree legumes.

    Following a workshop in Sydney in December, a framework and sampling strategy has been finalised to investigate aspects of adoption of the project practices. Semi-structured interviews will be used to understand household decision-making processes for adoption and social network analysis will be used to examine which people and institutions are influential in information transfer and exchange. Training in these techniques began in May and data collection will begin in June.

    The Advisory Committee continues to be an important mechanism for discussion of the direction and relevance of the project to regional initiatives and targets. The Committee met three times during the reporting period, with conversation focused in capacity building and replication of the project model to other groups and regions, future roles for OGTs, the importance of community participation and empowerment and the need for an exit strategy using the project success as a base for sustainability.

    In December 08, NTB was declared by the provincial government to be 'the land of a million cattle' (LMC) and a provincial task force was established to plan for this vision. A significant indication of the project's influence is that the Project Leader and Project Coordinator were both invited to join the small task force and are active in strategic planning and budgeting.

    Other examples of project influence include:
    In 2009 Dinas NTB has budgeted to buy 113 bulls (for all districts) and Dinas Central Lombok is planning to buy 40 bulls with their own budget. This is part of the local government's effort to adopt project recommendations.
    Training in site selection was provided by the project team to central Lombok Dinas and extension officers, who were selecting 40 kandangs at the same time as the project (April 09).

    Collaborating Institutions

    Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, NTB, Indonesia
    University of Mataram, Indonesia
    Livestock Services of Nusa Tenggara Barat Province, Indonesia

    Overview Objectives

    This project aims to raise the income of smallholder farmers in eastern Indonesia (Lombok) by increasing production of their Bali cattle to meet the growing demand for beef in Indonesia. Previous on-farm research has shown large profitability gains through the adoption of four simple and integrated herd management interventions: controlled seasonal natural mating; bull selection; weaning; and tactical supplementation of calves.

    This project will focus on scaling-out the herd management model with communities who house their cattle collectively in kandangs, which aid the adoption of these interventions. Scale-out methodology will include extension-worker training and farmer-farmer demonstration. Information on factors affecting adoption rates will be used to inform broader scale-out programs by government agencies.

    Project Budget

    $1,102,976.00

    Grant Report Value

    $1213274.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    4067

    Grant Report Finish Date

    31/12/2011

    Grant Report Start Date

    11/05/2007

    Building capacity in the knowledge and adoption of Bali cattle improvement technology in South Sulawesi

    Project Leader

    Dr Bruce Pengelly

    Email

    Bruce.Pengelly@csiro.au

    Fax

    07 3214 2308

    Phone

    07 3214 2348

    Project Country

    Project Coordinator Phone

    (02) 6217 0541
    0403 056675

    Project ID: 

    SMAR/2006/061

    Start Date

    01/06/2007

    Project Coordinator Fax

    (02) 6217 0501

    Reference Number

    BW-200808-50732

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Active

    Final Progress Report

    Bali cattle are a vital component of Indonesia's crop-livestock farming systems. Their production comes predominantly from smallholder farmers on eastern islands who own 2-4 cattle per household. Improving Bali cattle productivity on these smallholdings is essential not only to the Indonesian Government's beef self sufficiency targets, but also to improving the economic development of farmers living in these poor regions.
    The project builds on the success of previous ACIAR projects that have identified productivity constraints in the region and developed and successfully tested simple, low risk solutions. The resulting 'Best Bet' practices - making better use of existing forages, introducing new forages, controlled mating, early weaning with preferential feeding and feed budgeting - form the foundation of this project.
    A research focus of the project was on better understanding the adoption process, particularly how farmers and communities spread information and make decisions about new agricultural practices. In addition, the project team aimed to build capacity and positively influence local and regional institutions associated with livestock management.
    Productivity gains from uptake of best bet practices included a 50-100% increase in cattle numbers, substantial increases in forage area, improved quality of diet, daily liveweight gains equivalent to Rp6000, daily labour savings of 50% to 85% of hours spent on cattle management and perceived increases in cattle price.
    In examining the decision-making process around adoption, the importance of understanding resource prioritisation by farmers became clear, as did the need for interventions to align with local perceptions, priorities and existing practices.
    Demonstrating the benefits of adoption is a powerful tool to show potential, encourage farmers to experiment and to allay concerns about practices and their outcomes.
    The sharing of local knowledge by farmers and scientific knowledge by the project's On Ground Team (OGTs) has been a complementary and successful outcome of the project. OGTs encourage the adoption process through provision of scientific knowledge, access to information and ongoing support and advice. Farmers drive the scale out process, providing local legitimacy, networks and proof of benefits.
    In the project period, primary scale out from best bet farmers was recorded as 445. On average, one best bet farmer disseminated information to over five other farmers in even the harshest seasonal and topographical conditions (the highest ratio was 1:14). Key scale out networks were neighbours, family members, best bet farmers and OGTs.
    The rate and scope of scale out varied and were assisted by coupling information with resources (to allow knowledge to become action); supporting farmer interactions and tangible displays of the benefits of adoption; and training extension staff as a catalyst for broader scale out.
    Using data from the precursor project, it was possible to identify significant impacts beyond the usual project length and to focus on changes since the end of the project influence (1.5 years after project close).
    Analysis supported claims that implementation of project practices helped to improve household livelihoods through improved cattle condition increasing the value/price received for cattle, improved availability of forage and associated labour savings and freed labour invested into other income generating activities.
    There are strong indications that similar benefits are being experienced in the current project. Beyond the project we could expect labour savings to increase an additional 10% on original figures, more farmers to confirm that cattle condition and growth improved as a result of uptake, and the value of cattle, and hence the potential income from cattle, to at least remain stable.
    Technical capacity was raised to such a level in the community that farmers felt they had the skills, knowledge and confidence to become disseminators and mentors to other farmers.
    The OGT is a group of well trained, and now experienced, field workers. A series of training workshops for PPLs was trialled in the three study regions. While this has resulted in the scale out of project practices, to embed capacity in local institutions will require ongoing support and appropriate human and financial resourcing.
    Engagement with key regional stakeholders resulted in greater awareness of the project approach and potential, and better coordination in addressing issues of mutual concern. In general, interactions with local institutes were more productive than interactions with higher level institutes.
    The project produced significant capacity and community impacts, with key economic (particularly labour saving and value of cattle) and social (particularly improved communication and coordination) impacts expanded by the number of farmers reached.
    Recommendations for future work include: development and implementation of a training module for farmers and extension staff; a detailed livelihoods assessment to track livelihoods and other impacts after project close; and the future use of an OGT model for projects requiring regular and effective community engagement.

    Finish Date

    31/05/2010

    Extension Start Date

    01/06/2010

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Project Coordinator Email

    winter@aciar.gov.au

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    31/12/2011

    Overview Collaborators

    • Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
    • Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    • Livestock Services of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Peter Horne

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    Activities in the first year of the project were focused on establishing teams and facilities, selecting and engaging with communities in the three study regions, developing protocols and beginning the 'best bet' process with communities and farmers.

    The project employed 14 On Ground Team (OGT) members and one Project Officer in November 07 after an intensive recruitment process in August and September. The team is an impressive group of recent graduates and recruits with experience in smallholder farming systems and comprises skills in socio-economics, animal management, forage monitoring and smallholder farming - all with abilities in regional languages.

    The OGTs have received theoretical and practical training from SulSel and Australian specialists on an array of topics including forage analysis and monitoring, nursery establishment and maintenance, animal nutrition and health, farming systems and modelling and engagement and social survey techniques. Most OGT training is also attended by local agricultural extension staff from the project's study villages.

    To ensure effective project coordination, a multi-level team structure was established. The Project Management Team is responsible for operations & coordination; the Project Specialist Team is responsible for technical expertise & training and the On Ground Team is responsible for implementation & extension. A start-up meeting attended by all teams was held in Makassar in November 07.

    In addition, a Steering Committee was established in November 07, comprising representatives from Dinas Peternakan at provincial and regency levels, BPTP, UNHAS and CSIRO. The Committee's role is to provide overall guidance and advice on the direction and relevance of the project.

    Farming systems data were collected from all villages in the three study regencies - Barru, Gowa and Bone. Criteria for village selection included size and relative importance of cattle population, access to study sites, willingness of the community to participate and scope and willingness for adopting improved technology and recommendation of regional and local agricultural extension officers. Twelve study villages were selected in January. Village benchmarking (social, economic and cultural information) and mapping is due to be completed in May.

    In January, OGTs were placed in Barru, Gowa and Bone regencies. Introductions were made to local farmers, heads of village and local government officials. Accommodation, office space and facilities were sought in each region.

    This project builds on cattle and forage improvement tools and technologies developed by precursor ACIAR projects, and successfully tested and implemented by ACIAR project AS2/2004/005 (Improving smallholder crop-livestock systems in eastern Indonesia). In essence, the improvement technologies (Best Bets) are:
    Making better use of existing forages in a farming system
    Introducing new forages
    Seasonal (controlled) mating to match feed supply and labour needs
    Preferentially feeding particular animals
    Feed budgeting and planning to meet forecast feed demands

    Best Bet activities in the first field season will be predominantly focused on managing forage resources. Other options will be negotiated incrementally.

    Due to the late start of the project, the project team was not able to launch the Best Bet process (village workshop to identify constraints and options for increased cattle production; negotiation of Best Bet options with individual farmers; design and establishment of on-farm trials and monitoring) during the main 07-08 wet season.

    However, the project team is taking advantage of Bone's bimodal wet season ('small wet' from December to March and 'big wet' from April to July) to launch Best Bet activities in that regency's four study villages.

    A priority for the project team over the next six months is to finalise the model, methods and monitoring for scale-out activities for years 2 and 3. These will be largely be informed by the results and findings of the AS2/2004/005 project. Activities to date supporting scale-out include farmer-to-farmer visits, extension worker joint training, village and farmer group meetings and use of farmer and OGT diaries.

    Communication and engagement activities in year one include: organising or facilitating participating farmer visits to established Best Bet farmers, producing the first edition of a project newsletter which will be distributed to relevant institutions in South Sulawesi, Lombok and Australia; and engaging proactively with key regional stakeholders, including Dinas Peternakan at provincial and local levels, and heads of participating and interested villages in the study region.

    Year 2

    Activities in the second year of the project focused on consolidating best-bet activities in our 12 study villages across three regencies, establishing a framework for social research, supporting and tracking scale-out and capacity building.

    The best-bet process was completed in Barru and Gowa during the 08-09 wet season. This process incorporates a workshop in each study village to identify constraints and options for increased cattle production; negotiation of tailored best-bet options with individual farmers; design and establishment of on-farm trials. Village nurseries, cattle and forage monitoring and dynamic calendars of activities are now in place for each farming unit.

    Because of Bone's bimodal wet season ('small wet' from December to March and 'big wet' from April to July), best-bet activities in that regency's four study villages are well advanced. The project team reported that forage introduction (generally the 'entry point' of best-bet activities) by nearly all farmers was exceptionally good. Some farmers now have more feed than they can use and are actively giving planting material to other farmers to create their own forage supply, supporting significant scale-out. In addition, many farmers are already adopting better feeding practices and some with suitable aged calves commencing early weaning and preferential feeding.

    A new group of researchers has now taken responsibility for the social research component of the project. Following a workshop in Sydney in December, a framework and sampling strategy has been finalised to investigate aspects of adoption and impact of the best-bet practices. Semi-structured interviews will be used to understand household decision-making processes for adoption and social network analysis will be used to examine what people and institutions are influential in information transfer and exchange. Training in these techniques was given in May and data collection will begin in June.

    Impact work will centre on the assumption that increases in productivity lead to increases in income which lead to enhanced livelihoods. This will bring together both biophysical and social indicators and will focus on farmers (best-bet and scale-out) associated with the precursor project. Relevant training will be given in August.

    With several new members, the Project Steering Committee continues to provide guidance and advice on the direction and relevance of the project. The Committee met three times during the reporting period, both in Makassar and respective regencies. Committee discussion has been about synergies and communication between institutions, the need for collaboration between OGTs and PPLs, the importance of participation and forming and working with farmer groups.

    The project team identified farmer-to-farmer interactions as having the greatest potential to enhance scale-out of on-ground practices. Project activities supporting these interactions include farmer visits to established best-bet farmers in other regencies; a farmer field day in the study sub-district in Bone; supporting farmer 'champions' in each district; and maintaining and distributing a good source of forage material. Each best-bet farmer and OGT is collecting basic information about potential scale-out farmers. This information will be used in a mapping exercise and as part of the social research work.

    The greatest potential for long-term support for the project principles and approach (institutional scale-out and capacity) was agreed to be fostering closer links with PPLs and farmer groups, in existing and neighbouring villages. With agreement from local, regency and provincial Dinas managers, a pilot training program for PPLs and PPKs has been developed for the Libureng sub-district of the Bone regency, to begin in June. Initial training will focus on nursery establishment and forage management and use, to take advantage of the extended wet season. It is envisaged that OGTs will subsequently act as facilitators and advisors for the PPLs in setting up village nurseries and managing both forage and cattle. In return the project team is negotiating formal and informal training for OGTs in farmer group engagement and negotiation.

    Communication and engagement activities in year two include: presentations by project members at a number of international conferences; media coverage from Bajar TV (Makassar) of the Bone farmer field day; hosting two international journalists - one freelance writer and one from the Australian Financial Review; production of two editions of the project newsletter (distributed to relevant institutions in South Sulawesi, Lombok and Australia); regular engagement with government officials and heads of participating and interested villages in the study region.

    Collaborating Institutions

    Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
    Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    Livestock Services of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

    Overview Objectives

    In South Sulawesi (Sulsel) beef production is constrained by the quantity, quality and continuity of forage supply, and inappropriate herd management practices. Previous ACIAR projects have developed strategies to redress these constraints at the farm level, by establishing annual feed-plans based on crop residues, perennial or annual forages, tree legumes, or diet supplements in association with appropriate herd management strategies. This project is building on earlier project experience to increase the scope and cover a wider range of agro-ecological zones and socio-economic systems in Sulsel, extending adoption practices to an additional 12 communities. The modality deployed in this project is intended to become the model for extension services in Sulsel.

    Project Budget

    $1,072,533.00

    Grant Report Value

    $1179786.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    4067

    Grant Report Finish Date

    31/12/2011

    Grant Report Start Date

    10/05/2007

    Expanding the area for Rabi-season cropping in southern Bangladesh

    Project Leader

    Mr Neal Dalgliesh

    Email

    neal.dalgliesh@csiro.au

    Fax

    07 4688 1193

    Phone

    07 4688 1376

    Project Country

    Project ID: 

    LWR/2005/146

    Start Date

    01/01/2007

    Reference Number

    CR-202911-34407

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Concluded

    Final Progress Report

    A significant concern to food security in Bangladesh is that annual wheat production falls significantly short of consumer demand. Increasing the cropping intensity on currently under-utilised lands in southern Bangladesh offers the prospect of increased grain production and improved livelihoods of farmers in the region. This project provided the technical and extension support for farmers in southern Bangladesh to introduce new crops, such as wheat and mungbean, onto their lands during the post-rice Rabi season.
    Between 2007 and 2011, the project utilised on-farm trials, resource inventory assessment, systems modelling and livelihoods analysis to assess the production potential for crops, to develop appropriate agronomic practices and to promote their adoption in several districts in southern Bangladesh. The project achieved significant outcomes against all three of its objectives.
    Firstly, the physical and social characteristics of potential Rabi-cropping areas of southern Bangladesh areas were characterised to provide a basis for the development of appropriate agronomic practices and adoption processes. Technically, the most significant finding was the presence of shallow fresh ground water tables at most sites which positively supplemented crop water use. From a social perspective, a key insight was that women are key decision makers in crop selection and undertake most of the post harvest threshing and cleaning - this early finding led to changes in the project's training program. The livelihoods surveys reinforced the reality that, for farmers to adopt new crops, they have to be sure in their own mind that the risks (financial, human, social, natural and physical) are no greater than with the existing land use.
    Secondly, the project developed agronomic practices which resulted in farmers in southern Bangladesh reliably producing wheat yields of over 3 t/ha with limited irrigation and 2 t/ha as rainfed crops. These practices have been assessed and validated in 285 farmer-run trials in six southern districts over five seasons. The agronomic packages provide recommendations for variety choice, land preparation and sowing, fertilizer rate and irrigation scheduling. Specifically, five new wheat varieties were trialled and found to be similar in yield and phenology. For districts with salinity, promising wheat cultivars were screened from 63 lines and are potentially suited to very late planting (heat) and in saline conditions. The project promoted the use of the mungbean variety Bari Mung-6, the area of which is expanding within the regions where the project operated. The project produced the manual "How to grow wheat in southern Bangladesh and fit it into a timely annual sequence with other crops" and the ACIAR Technical Report "Sustainable intensification of Rabi cropping in southern Bangladesh using wheat and mung bean" (in press) which provide information for farmers, extension agents and researchers on the potential for the integration of wheat and mungbeans into existing rice based farming systems.
    Thirdly, farmers are being supported in their uptake of emergent cropping practices through training and support of the regional change agents who have on-going commitment to supporting smallholder farmers. Over 830 farmers, 305 regional extension personnel and 60 researchers were trained in wheat agronomy and management by WRC and project scientists. Farmer interviews suggest that the project has been successful in those villages that collaborated in the project - reports indicate participating farmers continued to grow wheat after cessation of project activities and sold wheat seed to non-participating neighbours. There is some evidence of farmers further afield also adopting wheat and mungbean production.
    As a direct consequence of project activities, Rabi-cropping of wheat and mungbean in southern Bangladesh is now regarded as a viable option by government extension services and NGOs.

    Finish Date

    30/06/2010

    Extension Start Date

    01/01/2011

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    28/02/2011

    Overview Collaborators

    • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Bangladesh
    • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh
    • PROSHIKA, Bangladesh
    • University of Queensland, Australia
    • International Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
    • Forum for Regenerative Agriculture Movement, Bangladesh

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Mirko Stauffacher

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    Excellent wheat yields achieved in successful project-sponsored farmer trials during the 2007/08 season, combined with current high demand and record prices for wheat grain in local markets, have created exactly the right ingredients for achieving the project objective of expanding rabi cropping in southern Bangladesh. With the project providing targeted technical and resource support to motivated local change agents (Proshika, WRC and DAE staff) at this time of high interest in wheat by farmers, the prospect of significant impacts from continued project investment is enticingly high. Confidence in benchmarking, recording and quantifying such impact is greatly enhanced by the associated efforts in livelihood analysis supported by the project, All in all, this project is well on track to surpassing its initial expectations.
    Farmers averaged nearly 4 t/ha in the large field-scale trials at Barisal and over 3.5 t/ha on Bhola island. In Noakhali, farmer yields averaged 2.3 t/ha across sites impacted by varying levels of salinity. Preliminary analysis indicates agronomic practices and released varieties, as recommended by WRC, are appropriate but that very late planting (late December) may reduce yields. In the more saline areas of Noakhali, varietal screening trials identified germplasm with consistent yield prospects for this region. While these results were influenced by the soft season finish of relatively cool temperatures and helpful rainfall during the 2007/08 season, this is the fourth consecutive season of acceptable wheat yields and so it is reasonable to reflect some confidence in achieving consistent crop yields in the regions of southern Bangladesh.
    Detailed interpretation of the 2007/08 experimental results is yet to be completed and is dependent on soil chemical and physical data which are currently being analysed. Once available, these trial data will be used to test the APSIM model.
    A remaining challenge to the project is to identify and spatially map land types with (i) current shallow tube well irrigation infrastructure, (ii) no salinity and surface storages of monsoon rainwater suitable for supplementary irrigation, (iii) near-surface water tables or high soil water holding capacity sufficient for dryland cropping or (iv) poor quality ground water but high quality surface water sufficient for irrigations. Some progress has been made in using satellite imagery to estimate surface water storage. Preliminary analyses, for example, indicate that for a 300ha region centred on Hazirhat, in the Noakhali region, there are 9.7ha of water bodies identifiable. This equates to 194ML (assuming 2m depth of water bodies) which is sufficient to potentially irrigate 100ha of wheat, assuming half this water is accessible for irrigation. Concentrated effort to progress such spatial mapping will occur during June 2008 when Perry Poulton visits Bangladesh with this specific purpose in mind.
    Clearly impressive in the project is the collaboration evident between WRC and Proshika, such that it was not possible for Australian collaborators to discern which individuals were employed by each organisation. The project employed two scientific officers, one in each organisation, in each region (Barisal, Bhola, Noakhali) and they appeared to really work as a team. This was also reflected in the attitude and voiced views of the respective organisational leaders. The results were apparent in very well run on-farm trials and field days. While the Australian collaborators may be vocal in designing the field program, its implementation is largely up to the local team and they have exceeded expectations.
    Given the excellent results to date, the project is well on course to ramp up extension and training activities for farmers in the upcoming 2008/09 season.

    Year 2

    High world wheat prices and the need to import more than three quarters of domestic demand has renewed interest amongst Bangladeshi farmers in wheat as a Rabi-season (dry season) cropping option. Over the past 10-20 years wheat production had lost favour amongst farmers due to reductions in yield resulting from increased disease pressures and the relative attractiveness of alternative Rabi-season crops, particularly Boro rice and vegetables. Historically wheat has been grown in the north of the country, however this project focuses on the south, a region which had been considered unsuitable for wheat production, until FAO funded research (2003/05) achieved yields in excess of 2.5 t/ha with new, disease resistant varieties grown using appropriate agronomic practice. Current research builds on this work exploring options to improve management of resources including irrigation and nutrients and to adapt farm management options to deal with specific local constraints. There has also been a broadening of research focus to include other Rabi-season cropping options, particularly pulses such as mungbean, and an increased emphasis on the extension of research findings to the southern Bangladesh farming community. Wheat yields of 3 to 4.5 t/ha have been consistently achieved over the 4 years of research although higher temperatures during grain fill and a lack of rainfall during the 2008/09 season reduced yields by around 20% across the south. This is however, a very positive outcome considering that crops were sown in late December, 1 month later than traditionally considered optimal, due to the late harvest of T. Aman rice.
    The increased availability of short season (60-100 days), well adapted wheat varieties bred by the Bangladesh Wheat Research Centre (WRC), and mungbean varieties which mature in 60 days, have contributed significantly to southern farming systems, providing farmers with increased choice in Rabi-season cropping. Wheat research under the project is now focussed on manipulation of variables including time of sowing, crop nutrition and irrigation to optimise yield and resource use. Trials undertaken during 2007/08 indicated that one irrigation at 20 days after sowing (DAS) was the most efficient use of limited water resources, increasing wheat yield by 0.7 t/ha compared to three irrigations (with 100 kg/ha of nitrogen (N) applied). Whilst research to explain this result is continuing it is thought that the response relates to increased mobilisation of applied N and associated improved development of adventitious roots and tillers. N use efficiency also improved with the use of one irrigation with a linear response to applied rates from 0 to 100 kg N/ha. This compared to three irrigations where response plateaued at 66 kg/ha and dryland which plateaued at 33 kg/ha. Recommendations for wheat production in southern Bangladesh have been changed in light of these findings and now differ from those in the north where at least 3 irrigations are required for successful wheat production. This begs the question-where is the crop sourcing the water necessary to support the levels of production being achieved in the south?
    Analysis of records of ground water level at key locations across the south suggest an under-utilised resource that, because the water table is high, has the potential to contribute significantly to wheat production through capillary rise. This effect is minimal further north in Bangladesh as the water table is much deeper. Modelling of wheat production at Bhola suggests that the mean contribution of the shallow water table to transpired crop water use is 62mm (SD=18.8mm) under irrigation and 79mm (SD=18.9mm) under dryland. This equates to a difference in mean simulated grain yield of 1.1 t/ha (SD=0.62 t/ha) and 1.4 t/ha (SD=0.38 t/ha) respectively. The importance of growing crops which are better able to utilise scarce water resources has not been lost on the farmers of Noakhali and Comilla districts who were forced to reduce Boro rice plantings during the recent season, or had crops die prematurely due to water shortages. Rice has a demand for at least 15 irrigations per season compared to wheat's 1 making it look increasingly attractive in a water constrained environment.
    On-farm demonstration sites, established by the project, which double as seed multiplication sites (SMT) for the new elite varieties are critical to the expansion of Rabi-season cropping. Collaborating farmers are supported by 16 regional research officers employed by the WRC and the NGO, Proshika. In 2007/08 45 sites were established in three regions with each farmer provided with seed, fertiliser and technical support to grow wheat and mungbeans. Farmers were trained to store their seed and undertook to sell at least some to neighbours for sowing in the following season. This program was expanded to 87 sites across six regions in 2008/09 and has been successful in showcasing options for Rabi-season cropping, developing expertise within the farming community and providing seed for future sowing. The success of this activity is exemplified in the village of Babuganj where Nasima Begum grew 800 m of wheat in 2007/08 (3.7 t/ha yield) and then sowed the land to mungbeans (1 t/ha yield). In 2008/09 she expanded production to 1000 m of wheat (3.5 t/ha yield) and 2400 m of mungbean and profited from the sale of wheat seed to 8 neighbours and mungbean to 5. Nasima is now recognised as the local farmer expert on the production of wheat and mungbeans and is sought out by her neighbours for advice.
    Quantification of available fallow land for Rabi-season cropping continues to be an important objective of the project. Constraints on accessing regional data for real-time in-season land use assessment has lead to the trialling of satellite imagery as a potential data source. Analysis of the Noakhali region for the 2006/07, 2007/08 cropping seasons demonstrate the potential to classify land use at small scale paddock level (< 0.2ha). Imaging analysis is used to identify and then quantify land remaining fallow with estimates of 10 to 14% of the land in the study areas (293 ha & 1592 ha) remaining fallow during January to March 2007. Differences between the generated data and estimates by the Dept of Ag Extension (6% fallow in 2005) made it necessary to ground truth these regions in 2009 to enable improved differentiation between fallows and similar land uses not well defined using satellite imagery. It is expected that this work will result in more accurate assessment of land use and determination of actual land available for expanded Rabi-season cropping.

    Project Background and Objectives

    Farmers in southern Bangladesh currently depend primarily on one rice crop per year to provide income for their families from tiny farms (commonly less than 1 ha). Thus around 800,000 ha of agricultural land lie uncultivated in southern Bangladesh during the dry (rabi) season, primarily because irrigation resources are limited by the general unsuitability of the area for deep or shallow tube wells. Other constraints add to the perception that the area is too risky for wheat in a rice-wheat rotation - the area is hotter than the north, with a shorter potential season, and some of the soils are saline.

    Sowing of wheat in the south is delayed well beyond the date considered optimal in the north because local wet season (kharif) rice varieties can be long duration. Also later drainage of monsoon waters delays the start of cultivation, a process which takes time with bullock-drawn ploughs.

    Recently these southern lands have been reassessed for cultivation of wheat. Trials funded by FAO (2003-05) and ACIAR (2005-06) demonstrated how to shorten the time between rice harvest and wheat planting, using surface-stored water for limited irrigation. Three years of on-farm trials at five sites produced wheat yields exceeding 2.5 t/ha, even without irrigation in some locations.

    Modelling in the ACIAR study, using historic local weather data and the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM), indicated that wheat, mungbean and maize can be grown with low-risk, long-term economic feasibility, particularly if surface flood water (stored over from the kharif season) is sufficient for one in-crop irrigation.

    Collaborating Institutions

    International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Bangladesh
    Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh
    PROSHIKA, Bangladesh
    University of Queensland, Australia
    International Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
    Forum for Regenerative Agriculture Movement, Bangladesh

    Program Areas

    Overview Methodologies

    This team is working through a four-step process concomitantly in several regions, starting with Noakhali, Barisal and Bhola with a control site in the traditional wheat-growing area of Jessore. In each region during the 2006-07 season the first step is to demonstrate six modern wheat varieties at three locations, each location using the farms of 12 adjacent farmers (grouped as a cell). Farmers will participate by selecting the best variety for their use in forthcoming project trials. Characterisation of the location water resources, soils and climate are centred around these cells.

    In the second step, on-farm trials to develop suitable management practices will be conducted at these same sites in the 2007-08 season. Trials will deal with irrigation, nitrogen fertility and tillage systems. Step 3 will involve training extension personnel in the new management packages in readiness for an outreach program and preparing appropriate training literature and tools. Step 4, in the 2008-09 season, will involve on-farm demonstration trials.

    Overview Objectives

    Specific objectives of this project are: to delineate and characterise the areas where rabi-season cropping is feasible on currently fallow lands, with or without supplementary irrigation; to tailor agronomic practices to suit each chosen region and socio-economic grouping, especially in the efficient utilisation of limited water resources and fertilisers (Bangladesh and Australia); to encourage farmer uptake of emergent cropping practices through training and support of the regional change agents committed to supporting Bangladeshi smallholder farmers.

    Project Budget

    $1,082,098.00

    Grant Report Value

    $1190308.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    4350

    Grant Report Finish Date

    28/02/2011

    Grant Report Start Date

    11/12/2006

    Development of emerging farmer crop-livestock systems in northern RSA

    Project Leader

    Dr Anthony Whitbread

    Email

    anthony.whitbread@csiro.au

    Fax

    08 8303 8436

    Phone

    08 8303 8455

    Project Country

    Project Coordinator Phone

    (02) 6217 0541
    0403 056675

    Project Outcomes

    Work targeting land-reform farmers in the livestock sector was conducted in four areas with divergent climate and resource endowments. On-farm field activities included: establishing veld monitoring sites; erecting exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources. A key constraint quickly identified was the limited knowledge base of farmers and extension officers about managing commercial farms, so capacity building became the focus.
    Over 70 farmers and 20 extension staff participated in several multi-day training courses and follow-up workshops. The development and distribution of appropriate extension material (covering veld, animal and financial management), training course material and a farm model which could be used to compare farm system improvement strategies, became part of these capacity-building efforts. These efforts have resulted in at least 20 land-reform farmers implementing changes such as reduced stocking rates, rotational grazing and better herd management and marketing. This shows that on-going efforts to build capacity in local extension staff and farmers and introduce practical and low risk technologies can be successful.
    Within the cropping sector (rainfed cereal-based systems), no emerging farmers were identified as obtaining farms through the land-reform programs. The project therefore targeted existing smallholder farmers in the former homelands who aspired to sell produce. An extensive 4-year program of applied field research based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of grain legume-based cash cropping was established in four large farming communities. Project activities included demonstrations, researcher/student trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion workshops, field days and farm walks.
    A key outcome of this work was to demonstrate that more that 50 resource-poor farmers were able to transform low-productivity maize-based farming systems into more-profitable enterprises, by incorporating grain legume cash crops into rotations with maize and adopting simple agronomic practices. Many of these farmers can now package, store and sell high-value legume products when, just three years earlier they were barely at subsistence levels of food production. Another notable success of the crop-based work included the development of guarbean as a potential industrial cash crop (seed multiplication, variety evaluations, harvesting, processing and market development), the identification, testing and the multiplication of five short-season multi-purpose lablab lines for use as forage in rotation with maize, and the promotion of well adapted and high value cowpea lines. In association with this work, two female students completed MSc level studies, five others obtained honours level dissertations and in March 2010, two MSC students were nearing completion of their theses.
    The political imperative to implement land reform in South Africa is intensifying. Sensible policies, secure land tenure and on-going support of new farmers will go a long way towards securing the agricultural production future of Limpopo Province. Within the government agricultural services there is still only a limited capacity to support emerging farmers with appropriate advice, input support or infrastructure investment. This project has demonstrated the importance of investing in capacity building (farmers, extension staff and researchers), targeting appropriate communities for change, and identifying local champions (farmers and extension officers) - all of which can lead to positive changes in rural communities.

    Project ID: 

    LPS/2002/081

    Start Date

    01/01/2005

    Project Coordinator Fax

    (02) 6217 0501

    Reference Number

    BW-202810-42222

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Concluded

    Final Progress Report

    In the Republic of South Africa, there have traditionally existed dual agricultural sectors: commercial and subsistence based farming systems whose evolution is based on the land and social policies of pre-democracy governments. The post apartheid land reform policies of land restitution and redistribution have created opportunities for the previously disadvantaged population to own and farm land. These new farmers, together with farmers from the subsistence sector who are attempting to commercialise, now make up a third middle sector termed the 'emerging farmer' sector. Whilst much hope is vested in the emerging farm sector, there are significant barriers to, and few examples so far of, its success. This project, initiated in 2005, aimed to improve the sustainability of emerging farmers who operate in crop or livestock farming systems in the Limpopo Province and to support researchers and extension staff to develop systems based participative research and extension programs to assist land reform farmers make the transition to commercial farming.
    Work that targeted land reform farmers in the livestock sector was conducted in 4 areas with divergent climate and resource endowments - Steilloop/Rebone (Waterberg), Maboi (Capricorn), Mannamead (Capricorn) and Nwanedi (Vhmebe). The on-farm field activities included: establishing veld monitoring sites; erecting exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources. The limited knowledge base farmers and extension officers had about managing commercial farms was quickly identified as a key constraint, so capacity building became the focus. Over 70 farmers and 20 extension staff participated in several multi-day training courses and follow-up workshops. The development and distribution of appropriate extension material (covering veld, animal and financial management), training course material and a farm model which could be used to compare farm system improvement strategies, became part of these capacity building efforts. These efforts have resulted in at least 20 land reform farmers implementing changes such as reduced stocking rates, rotational grazing and better herd management and marketing. This is evidence that on-going efforts to build capacity in local extension staff and farmers and introduce practical and low risk technologies can be successful.
    Within the cropping sector (rainfed cereal based systems), no emerging farmers were identified as obtaining farms through the land reform programs. The project therefore targeted existing smallholder farmers in the former homelands who aspired to selling produce. An extensive 4 year program of applied field research based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of grain legume-based cash cropping was established in 4 large farming communities: (i) farmer associations at Perkesbult/Bloodriver in Capricorn district; (ii) smallholders in the village of Dwzerani, Vhembe district; (iii) in the Mafarana and Gabaza villages in Mopani district; and (iv) in the Kulani and Sismukani villages of Bohlabela district (Mpumalanga Province). The activities included demonstrations, researcher/student trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion workshops, field days and farm walks. A key outcome of this work was to demonstrate that more that 50 resource poor farmers were able to transform low-productivity maize-based farming systems into more-profitable enterprises by incorporating grain legume cash crops into rotations with maize and adopting simple agronomic practices. Many of these farmers can now package, store and sell high-value legume products when, just three years earlier they were barely at subsistence levels of food production. Another notable success of the crop-based work included the development of guarbean as a potential industrial cash crop (seed multiplication, variety evaluations, harvesting, processing and market development), identification, testing and the multiplication of 5 short season multi-purpose lablab lines for use as forage in rotation with maize and promotion of well adapted and high value cowpea lines. In association with this work, 2 female students completed MSc level studies, 5 others obtained honours level dissertations and in March 2010, two MSC students were nearing completion of their theses.
    The political imperative to implement land reform in South Africa is intensifying. Sensible policies, secure land tenure and on-going support of new farmers will go a long way to securing the agricultural production future of Limpopo Province. Within the government agricultural services there does still exist a limited capacity to support emerging farmers with appropriate advice, input support or infrastructure investment. This project has demonstrated the importance of investing in capacity building (farmers, extension staff and researchers), targeting appropriate communities for change and identifying local champions (farmers and extension officers) which can result in positive changes in rural communities. In the smallholder-homeland communities, the limitations of 'permission to occupy' and farm size (1-2 ha) will generally limit farming enterprises gaining economies of scale. Transformational changes such as mechanisation and conservation agricultural practices that are necessary to improve sustainability will therefore require some public-private initiatives and state support.

    Finish Date

    31/12/2008

    Extension Start Date

    01/01/2009

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Project Coordinator Email

    winter@aciar.gov.au

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    31/12/2009

    Overview Collaborators

    • Department of Agriculture, South Africa
    • University of the North, South Africa
    • University of Venda, South Africa
    • Progress Milling, South Africa
    • Jodems Agri-Pioneers, South Africa
    • Bushveld Environmental Services, South Africa

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Peter Horne

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    From 1999 to 2003, ACIAR funded project AS2/96/149 which researched and promoted the use of grain and forage legumes in crop and livestock systems in Zimbabwe and Limpopo province, South Africa. Notable project successes were, to a large extent, the result of investments in capacity building of the project team (students, extension staff, researchers) and well-targeted interventions. A new project was initiated in 2002 following on from some of the successes from AS2/196/149, however it was recommended that a new project should undertake an integrated RD&E program to help the 'emerging farmer' sector in Limpopo, South Africa become more profitable and sustainable. This emerging farmer sector had been broadly defined as previously disadvantaged farmers who are attempting to make a transition to commercially based agriculture. During the planning stages, it was concluded that land reform schemes underway in RSA would result in the creation of a new sector of emerging farmers. Land reform has proceeded slowly however, so the major sector of previously disadvantaged farmers in Limpopo remains as the non-commercial subsistence sector. While this project has successfully engaged some land reform farmers, mainly in the rangeland (veld) areas, tenure of most of the livestock farmers remains uncertain. Amongst the cropping based farmer groups, all are smallholder farmers with varying capacities and desires to make a transition from subsistence based farming to more commercially orientated farming systems.

    Activities in the new project, led by Dr Anthony Whitbread of CSIRO and Mr Jeffery Mkhari of the Limpopo Department of Agriculture, began in March 2005 with a visit by the Australian project team and a startup workshop with the project partners (The Limpopo Department of Agriculture, The University of Venda for Science and Technology, The University of Limpopo, Progress Milling, the provinces largest grain milling company and a private consulting company AGES). The project, essentially divided into work on veld based livestock production systems and work on cropping based systems, has undertaken RD&E activities within 7 communities in 4 districts of Limpopo Province, engaging at least 250 farmers and their families in Year 1. To date there have been no mixed crop-livestock systems identified where synergistic opportunities exist for legume forage interventions.

    The CSE Rangelands and Savannas team (Neil MacLeod and Cam Mcdonald) with assistance from the Limpopo Department of Agriculture (LDA) veld team (led by Frits van Oudtshoorn) have undertaken activities with 3 farmer livestock groups based at Steilloop (Rebone) in Waterburg District, Nwanedi in the Vhembe District and Maboi in the Capricorn district. During the initial site inspections, it became apparent that insufficient property size and forage limitations due to veld degradation, in particular bush thickening and loss of perennial grasses, were the most critical management problems facing the emerging farmer groups. The need for legume fodder banks, which had been advanced as the key project technology was rated to be of a lesser priority. The main focus of field and communication activities has been strategically switched to veld monitoring, exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources. Without a viable pasture base, any objectives to promote advanced animal nutrition and marketing of better classes of stock are of doubtful viability. In line with these conclusions, there have been trial sites (exclosure plots and pasture plantings) established on several farms and a commitment to similar at the remaining group sites; Resource assessments were made in April 2006 at case study farms at Steilloop, Nwanedi and Maboi. Discussions have been held with farmers to aid in the planning of the first round of group training to be held at Steilloop in July-August 2006. Workshops are also to be planned for the other sites, for late 2006 and early 2007.

    The crop based work has been undertaken by Dr Kingsley Ayisi of AGES and teams from the University of Limpopo led by Dr Victoria Ayodele, and the University of Venda led by Dr Odhiambo with support from the local departmental extension officers. All the farmers engaged to date are smallholders and not land reform recipients. An extensive program of applied field research activities, based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of cash cropping, have been undertaken in four communities: 23 farmers from Dzwerani village, Vhembe district; 8 farmer associations at Perkesbult/Bloodriver in Capricorn district (in association with the ICRISAT-Dimes SMCN/2000/173 project): About 25 farmers from Mafarana and Gabaza villages, Mopani district; 69 farmers from Kulani and Sismukani near Thulamahashe town in Bohlabela District. The activities undertaken include demonstrations, researcher managed trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion based workshops, fields days and farm walks. At the Mopani and Vhembe sites, MSC students have established on-farm field trials to collect some key data sets for use in their thesis and modelling validations. Benchmarking data collected at all sites indicate a large proportion of farmers > 60 years old, poor knowledge about basic agronomy, dissatisfaction with low and unreliable crop production, constrained resources available for inputs and a desire to produce enough produce in excess of home consumption for sale.

    In Australia, an on-farm and on-station research program has been established in the Border Rivers and Maranoa-Balonne regions of southeast Queensland to demonstrate and undertake further research on mixed pasture-crop systems. Sites across both catchments have been sown to a range of large scale demonstrations of new legume pasture spp and annual fodder systems and more detailed small plot research sites. Field days and farm walks have created interest in the opportunities for improving production from pasture phases in farming communities where there are economic, social and environmental drivers to reduce the area used for crop production..

    Year 2

    The main aim of this project is to improve the sustainability of emerging farmers who operate in crop or livestock farming systems in the Limpopo Province, South Africa and to support two local Universities and the Limpopo Department of Agriculture in conducting participative research and extension. The emerging farmer sector is made up of new farmers created by the land reform programs or existing previously disadvantaged farmers who are attempting to make a transition to commercially based agriculture. Emerging farmers created from the land reform schemes are essentially restricted to those undertaking livestock activities in the low rainfall rangeland (veld) areas, whereas crop based emerging farmers are predominantly pre-existing smallholder farmers in the former homelands. While this project has successfully engaged some land reform farmers, mainly in the rangeland (veld) areas, tenure of most of the livestock farmers remains uncertain and is considered to be a major impediment to success of these farmers. Amongst the cropping based farmer groups, all are smallholder farmers with varying capacities and desires to make a transition from subsistence based farming to more commercially orientated farming systems.

    The project is led by Dr Anthony Whitbread of CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Mr Jeffery Mkhari of the Limpopo Department of Agriculture. It started in March 2005 with a visit by the Australian project team and a startup workshop with the project partners (The Limpopo Department of Agriculture, The University of Venda for Science and Technology, The University of Limpopo, Progress Milling, the provinces largest grain milling company and a private consulting company AGES). The project, divided into work on veld based livestock production systems and work on cropping based systems, has undertaken RD&E activities within 7 communities in 4 districts of Limpopo Province, engaging at least 250 farmers and their families. To date there have been no mixed crop-livestock systems identified where synergistic opportunities exist for legume forage interventions. There is, however, the potential for these systems to develop in many of the smallholder cropping areas.

    The CSE Rangelands and Savannas team (Neil MacLeod and Cam Mcdonald) with assistance from the Limpopo Department of Agriculture (LDA) veld team (led by Frits van Oudtshoorn) have undertaken activities with 3 farmer livestock groups based at Steilloop (Rebone) in Waterburg District, Nwanedi in the Vhembe District and Maboi in the Capricorn district. As reported in the 2006/07 annual report, uncertain land tenure, insufficient property size and forage limitations due to veld degradation, in particular bush thickening and loss of perennial grasses, were the most critical management problems facing the emerging farmer groups. The need for legume fodder banks, which had been advanced as the key project technology was rated to be of a lesser priority. The main focus of field and communication activities was therefore strategically switched to veld monitoring, exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources. In line with these conclusions, there has been trial sites (exclosure plots and pasture plantings) established on farms at all sites.

    The crop based work has been undertaken by Dr Kingsley Ayisi of AGES and teams from the University of Limpopo led by Professors Ayodele and Mariga, and the University of Venda led by Dr Odhiambo. Local departmental extension officer support is considered an essential component of the program and has been sought at all sites with varying degrees of success. All the farmers engaged to date are smallholders and not land reform recipients. An extensive program of applied field research activities, based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of cash cropping, have been undertaken in four communities: 25 farmers from Dzwerani village, Vhembe district; 8 farmer associations at Perkesbult/Bloodriver in Capricorn district (building on the associations of the ICRISAT-Dimes SMCN/2000/173 project): About 25 farmers from Mafarana and Gabaza villages, Mopani district; >100 farmers from Kulani and Sismukani near Thulamahashe town in Bohlabela District. The activities undertaken include demonstrations, researcher managed trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion based workshops, fields days and farm walks. At the Mopani and Vhembe sites, MSC students have continued field trials to collect some key data sets for use in their projects and modelling validations. In the past 12 months, Guar bean has also been introduced as a potential industrial cash crop and seed multiplication, on-farm experiments, harvesting and processing and market development is underway led by Jeff Mkhari and also a new MSC student Mrs Ruth Mkhari. For the remainder of the projects life key field activities will continue but a greater emphasis will be on the development of extension material and the communication of this material in an effort to improve the livelihoods of many of the smallholder cropping farmers involved.

    In Australia, on-farm and on-station activities were established in the Border Rivers and Maranoa-Balonne regions of southeast Queensland to demonstrate and undertake further research on mixed livestock-crop systems. Sites across both catchments have been sown to a range of large scale demonstrations of new legume pasture species and annual fodder systems and more detailed small plot research sites. Field days and farm walks have created interest in the opportunities for improving production from pasture phases in farming communities where there are economic, social and environmental drivers to reduce the area used for crop production. For the last 2 years of the project, the Australian component will be continued under other funding arrangements, and the focus of this ACIAR project will be generating communication and extension materials for South Africa and creating as many opportunities as possible for significant farmer adoption and commercialisation.

    Year 3

    The aim of this project is to improve the sustainability of emerging farmers who operate in crop or livestock farming systems in the Limpopo Province, South Africa and to support local researchers and extension staff to develop systems based participative research and extension programs. The emerging farmer sector is made up of new farmers created by government land reform programs or existing smallholder subsistence farmers who are attempting to make a transition to commercially based agriculture. Emerging farmers created from the land reform schemes are largely restricted to those undertaking livestock activities in the low rainfall veld (rangeland) areas, whereas crop based emerging farmers are predominantly pre-existing smallholder farmers in the former homelands. While this project has successfully engaged some land reform farmers, mainly livestock farmers, the land tenure of many remains uncertain and is considered to be a major impediment to their success. Amongst the cropping based farmer groups, all are smallholder farmers with varying capacities and desires to make the transition from subsistence based farming to more commercially orientated farming systems.
    Now in its 4th year, the emerging farmers project is led by Dr Anthony Whitbread of CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems with local South African partners Mr Jeffery Mkhari (Limpopo Department of Agriculture) Dr Jude Odhiambo (University of Venda for Science and Technology) and Prof. Victoria Ayodele (University of Limpopo). Dr Kingsley Ayisi, a private consultant based in Limpopo has provided excellent support and service to the project as has Mr Frits van Oudtshoorn, formerly an LDA officer and now a private consultant. Dr Bruce Pengelly gives excellent support to the project in his role as an advisor and providing training.
    The livestock and veld management focussed work is led by Mr Cam McDonald and Mr Neil MacLeod (CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems) with assistance from LDA animal and pasture extension staff. Field research and training activities have been undertaken with three farmer livestock groups based at Steilloop in Waterburg District, Nwanedi in the Vhembe District and Maboi in the Capricorn district, and in the last year an additional group of farmers at Mannamead in the Capricorn district. Uncertain land tenure, insufficient property size and forage limitations due to veld degradation, in particular bush thickening and loss of perennial grasses, are critical management problems facing these emerging farmers. The program has included veld monitoring, exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources and training. A key focus has been the delivery to farmers (100+) and extension staff (20+) multi-day training courses and follow-up workshops. The development of a brochure, "Veld Management - the Basics" has summarised key information from these interactions and is being widely distributed. This team has engaged the South African pasture research community in discussions around how to intervene effectively in emerging farmer communities.
    The crop based work has engaged smallholder farmers, not land reform recipients and established an extensive program of applied field research activities based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of cash cropping. These have been undertaken with focal groups of farmers in five communities: 25 farmers from Dzwerani village, Vhembe district; 8 farmer associations at Perkesbult/Bloodriver in Capricorn district (building on the associations of the ICRISAT-Dimes SMCN/2000/173 project): 50 farmers from Mafarana and Gabaza villages, Mopani district; 40 farmers from Kulani and Sismukani in Bohlabela District. The activities include demonstrations, researcher/student trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion based workshops, fields days and farm walks. At the Bohlobela community, resource constrained smallholder farmers have shown that they can adopt improved agronomic practices and increase cultivation and production of cash crops for sale. A wonderful and significant outcome that we hope to build on in other communities. The guar bean activities started in 2006/07 as a potential industrial cash crop industry has continued with seed multiplication, variety evaluations, harvesting, processing and market development. There is much enthusiasm from government and the mining industry for this to continue and extension material has been developed. For the remainder of the project, key field activities will continue but with a greater emphasis on the development of extension material and the communication of this material. Local departmental extension officer support is considered an essential component of the program and has been sought at all sites with varying degrees of success - this issue remains a significant impediment to progress. There have been significant positive changes in the capacity of local researchers to undertake relevant research and the project to date has enabled 2 female students complete MSc level studies and 4 other individuals obtain honours level dissertations. Two of these students have continued onto MSc level work with the project.
    South Africa and southern Africa more broadly, needs more than ever practical systems based RD&E to assist its governmental services, municipalities and NGO's tackle the multitude of problems facing large rural populations.

    Year 4

    The project commenced in 2005 with the aim of improving the sustainability of emerging farmers who operate in crop or livestock farming systems in the Limpopo Province, South Africa, and to support local researchers and extension staff to develop systems based participatory research and extension programs. The `emerging farmer' sector is comprised of new farm enterprises created by government land reform programs and/or existing smallholder subsistence farmers who are striving to make the difficult transition to commercially based agriculture. The component created under land reform schemes is largely restricted to undertaking livestock activities in the low rainfall veld (rangeland) areas, whereas the crop-based component largely comprises pre-existing smallholder farmers located in the former homelands. This sector was seen to have more scope in terms of motivation and access to resources for making a successful transition, a priority under the national Black Economic Empowerment program (BEE), than the smallholder and near-urban subsistence sector that has been the focus of many previous unsuccessful development projects.
    A project extension supported by ACIAR now allows the project to continue until 31 December 2009. It is led by Dr Anthony Whitbread of CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems with local South African partners Mr Jeffery Mkhari (Limpopo Department of Agriculture), Prof. Jude Odhiambo (University of Venda for Science and Technology) and Prof. Victoria Ayodele (University of Limpopo). Dr Kingsley Ayisi, a private consultant based in Limpopo Province, has been engaged to service our activities with the Bohlobela communities as part of the smallholder cropping activities. The activities that are focussed on livestock and veld management have been led by Mr Cam McDonald and Mr Neil MacLeod (CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems) with assistance from animal and pasture extension staff of the LDA and local Municipalities. Mr Frits van Oudtshoorn, a pasture scientist formerly of the LDA, has also been contracted by the project to assist with training activities and development of extension materials.
    The crop based activities have largely engaged smallholder farmers, rather than land reform recipients, and have established an extensive program of applied field research based around the themes of improving soil fertility, agronomic management and the introduction of cash cropping. In the past 12 months, activities have continued in 3 farming communities in 3 districts: farmer associations at Perkesbult/Bloodriver (Capricorn district): in the Mafarana and Gabaza villages (Mopani district); Kulani and Sismukani villages (Bohlabela district-now part of Mpumalanga Province). The activities include demonstrations, researcher/student trials, farmer experiments, farmer discussion workshops, field days and farm walks. Two communities, of >50 resource poor farmers each, have demonstrated through adaptive research that it is possible to transform low-productivity maize-based farming systems into more-profitable enterprises by incorporating grain legume cash crops into rotations with maize. These farmers are now packaging, storing and selling high-value legume products, when just three years earlier they were barely at subsistence levels of food production.
    In the past 12 months, the livestock and veld management activities have focused on local capacity building activities for both extension personnel and participant farmers. Field research and training activities have been undertaken with 3 livestock farmer groups based at Steilloop (Waterburg district), Nwanedi (Vhembe district), Maboi (Capricorn district), and in the last year an additional farmer group at Mannamead (Capricorn district). A limited field program has included establishing veld monitoring sites; erecting exclosures to identify relictual site potential and to test the feasibility of spelling, shrub control and other reclamation strategies to reclaim lost productivity of the pasture resources; and skills-based training. A key focus has been the delivery to farmers (100+) and extension staff (20+) of multi-day training courses and follow-up workshops, and the development of appropriate extension material which has been critically unavailable to both extension personnel and individual farmers. In rangeland based beef systems, ~ 40 new farmers resulting from government land reform policies have learnt new skills to better manage soil and pasture resources and beef businesses. Significant outcomes such as the adoption of more sustainable grazing practices such as decreased stocking rates and rotational grazing and successes in marketing beef are evidence that on-going efforts to build capacity in local extension staff and farmers and introduce practical and low risk technologies have been successful. Limited capacity within the government agricultural services to support emerging farmers with appropriate advice, input support or infrastructure investment hampers such demonstrated successes being replicated more widely.

    Project Background and Objectives

    A previous ACIAR project (AS2/1996/144) introduced and evaluated legumes into southern African farming systems in Zimbabwe. Legumes were tested and intercropped with maize and sorghum in mixed systems, including investigating their role as protein supplements in dairy and beef production systems.

    As a result significant changes have been adopted in farming systems in parts of Zimbabwe. The project and its outcomes are particularly applicable in South Africa where a group of emerging farmers have the resources to apply this research; a lack of resources being the main constraint to adoption.

    Farmers in the Limpopo Province of South Africa rely on crop-based or livestock-based systems. These systems are causing land degradation at an unsustainable rate. For livestock farmers improved grain production and feed would help produce cattle in improved condition, enhancing their marketability and access to commercial sale. Legumes in cropping-based farming would likely boost follow-on yields and alleviate land degradation.

    Collaborating Institutions

    Department of Agriculture, South Africa
    University of the North, South Africa
    University of Venda, South Africa
    Progress Milling, South Africa
    Jodems Agri-Pioneers, South Africa
    Bushveld Environmental Services, South Africa

    Overview Methodologies

    Identify livestock-based sites and communities
    Literature review of veldt management literature
    Benchmarking current practices/markets/herds/veldt condition
    Testing fodder bank systems as a dry season feed supply
    Integrated analysis tool modified and used for scenario testing with farmer groups
    Expert technical panel to review veldt management and nutritional issues
    Extension material development
    Identify cropping based sites and communities
    Legume evaluations
    Seed multiplication of best bets
    Design on-farm experiments with farmers
    Implement on-farm experiments
    Collection of APSIM model requirements (soil and climate)
    APSIM & IAT analyses of crop/legume/fertiliser decisions and best bet options
    Identify motivated extension officers for each community
    Training course for facilitators, leaders and managers
    Training of researchers in systems integration, APSIM and data collection
    Technical (veldt/herd management; plant production) training courses
    Capacity building of farmer groups built through farm visits and field days

    Overview Objectives

    The main aim of the project is to improve the sustainability of emerging farmers who operate in crop-only, livestock-only and crop-livestock production systems in the Limpopo Province, RSA.
    The objectives are to:
    develop and promote a range of forage and veld management strategies that assist emerging farmers to match the market specifications for store cattle in Limpopo Province - essentially develop economic feed year plans.
    improve the productivity, efficiency and sustainability of crop production in mixed and crop-only emerging farming systems.
    build the capacity of the Limpopo DOA and University partners in targeting/facilitating and managing sustainable beef/maize production systems and conducting on-farm, participative research in the rural communities of Limpopo.
    build the capacity of beef/crop farmers to run profitable and sustainable farming enterprises.

    Project Budget

    $853,825.00

    Grant Report Value

    $939208.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    5064

    Grant Report Finish Date

    31/12/2009

    Grant Report Start Date

    02/09/2004

    Implementation of rodent management in intensive irrigated rice production systems in Indonesia and Vietnam

    Project Leader

    Dr Peter Brown

    Email

    Peter.Brown@csiro.au

    Fax

    0262421505

    Phone

    0262421562

    Project Country

    Project Coordinator Phone

    (02) 6217 0547
    0408 270337

    Project ID: 

    ADP/2003/060

    Start Date

    01/04/2006

    Project Coordinator Fax

    (02) 6217 0501

    Reference Number

    AJ-201811-36233

    Project Type

    Bilateral

    Project Status

    Concluded

    Final Progress Report

    Rodents remain a significant pest of lowland irrigated rice cropping systems throughout Southeast Asia causing around 15% yield loss to rice annually. Rodents are the number one pest of rice in Indonesia and one of the top three pests in Vietnam. Farmers describe rodents as the pest they have least control over. Traditionally, farmers have relied heavily on the use of rodenticides, electrocution and spreading sump oil mixed with insecticides onto flooded rice fields to manage the rodent problem, but these can be expensive, are often applied individually by farmers in an uncoordinated manner after significant damage has already occurred, and have environmental problems. Rodents affect households that are dependent on rice production for their livelihoods and impact on poor farming communities who have few resources.
    This project was designed to implement ecologically-based rodent management (EBRM) which can reduce rat damage, increase yields and reduce the reliance on rodenticides. This project builds on the findings from previous ACIAR projects (AS1/1998/036). EBRM relies on an understanding of the ecology of rats which then governs better integrated Community Actions (CA; synchronised cropping, field and village hygiene, rat hunts at key times) and the Community Trap Barrier System (CTBS; plastic fence set with rat traps enclosing a small area of early planted rice). These approaches need community cooperation. Key issues are how to deliver EBRM to the wider farming community, develop extension materials, increase cost-effectiveness, build the capacity of support staff, and develop pathways to enhance the adoption of EBRM. The project was successful in delivering these and implementing EBRM.
    Project activities occurred in lowland irrigated rice systems in Vietnam (Ha Nam province in the Red River Delta and An Giang province in the Mekong River Delta) and Indonesia (Karawang district West Java and Pinrang district in South Sulawesi). It involved a multidisciplinary team of research and extension agencies in Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines and Australia.
    Farming communities in each area were trained and supported in implementing EBRM from 2006. The approach used was the "training-of- trainers" (TOT) of local extension staff which was built up and expanded over the course of the project. Modules were integrated in national training programs. Training and supporting activities expanded from core sites each year and expanded to neighbouring villages and districts over each subsequent year (2007-2009). For example, EBRM activities expanded from 15 communes in Ha Nam Province in 2006 to 152 in 2009. Adoption and diffusion of EBRM was evident outside project areas. There were 17,000 farmers trained in Vietnam and 20,000 farmers trained in Indonesia. Farmer surveys, field observations and interviews were used to assess changes in farmer behaviour and activities.
    The majority of farmers adopted CA as a successful rodent control strategy. The adoption of CTBS occurred only on sites where government subsidies were available to farmers. After implementing EBRM, rodent damage was reduced by 33-50% (reduced by up to 88% in Ha Nam Province), rice yields were increased by 2-5%, rodenticide use was reduced by 62-90%, and the use of electrocution was reduced by 95%. There was a strong shift away from individual actions to group or community actions.
    Key findings to ensure sustainable EBRM include the need to have good coordination between civic and government agencies to enable farmer participation, strong, effective leadership of farmer groups is required, management needs to be conducted early in the growth of the rice crop before rodent populations commence breeding.
    Community impacts include increased participation of farmers and desire to involve community members to manage rats at a community/village level. There was also benefit of mutual management for rodents and brown plant hoppers in the Mekong Delta because of synchronised cropping. Economic impacts include the reduction in rodent damage leading to increased yields and subsequent increases in benefits for farming households. Social impacts include increased involvement within the farming community to bring a common benefit to the whole community through the rodent management, and involvement in communal rodent management with neighbouring villages. Environmental impacts include the significant reduction in use of rodenticides, plastic sheeting for protecting crops, and use of insecticides mixed with sump oil that was spread over paddy fields. There were 65 scientific reports and publications produced by the project.
    This project has successfully demonstrated that it is possible to implement EBRM with farmers in lowland irrigated rice farming systems in Indonesia and Vietnam. To achieve effective and sustainable EBRM it is recommended to use Community Actions which incorporate synchronised cropping, field and village hygiene, rat hunts at key times, but they need to be supported by local and provincial governments.

    Finish Date

    30/09/2009

    Extension Start Date

    01/10/2009

    Commissioned Organisation: 

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Project Coordinator Email

    hearn@aciar.gov.au

    Commissioned Organisation

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

    Extension Finish Date

    31/03/2010

    Overview Collaborators

    • World Vision of Vietnam, Vietnam
    • Plant Protection Department, Vietnam
    • International Rice Research Institute, Philippines
    • Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, Indonesia

    ACIAR Research Program Manager

    Dr Simon Hearn

    Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

    Year 1

    The project is progressing according to plan and on track to meeting all milestones.

    Project start-up workshops in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City, 14-15/2/06, 25 participants) and Indonesia (Makassar, 24-25/7/06, 25 participants) were highly successful and showed strong commitment from project partner organizations and staff in Vietnam (PPD, NIPP, WVV) and Indonesia (IAARD, AIAT, IIRR). Long term objectives and associated activities were reiterated, detailed annual project plans were developed and case study areas were identified.

    Project sites in Vietnam (An Giang and Ha Nam) and Indonesia (South Sulawesi and West Java) have been identified on the basis of discussions with experts, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and other programs in the area, and have been established in the third quarter of 2006 in Vietnam (7 treatment and 7 references hamlets in An Giang; 13 treatment and 6 reference hamlets in Ha Nam) and will be established in the first quarter of 2007 in Indonesia. At this first stage of the project treatment sites receive Trap Barrier System (TBS) and/or Community Action (CA) demonstration, extension and information. Note that CA includes ecological rodent management practices like synchronized cropping, timed community campaigns and field hygiene.

    In alignment with the establishment of project sites, detailed baseline information for these sites is collected using Knowledge, Attitude and Practice & Socio-Economic (KAP&SE) household surveys, KIIs and FGDs, which were conducted and entered in the second half of 2006 in Vietnam and will be conducted and entered in the first half of 2007 in Indonesia.

    Training for project staff included a 2-day KAP&SE survey development and training workshop in Vietnam and Indonesia, and a 4-day ACCESS data entry training workshop in Vietnam. In addition, the 3rd International Conference on Rodent Biology and Management (ICRBM) in Vietnam (Hanoi, 28/8/06 till 1/9/06) provided an excellent opportunity for in-country project leaders to exchange ideas and experiences as well as to present these to the wider scientific community.

    Training courses for farmers in Vietnam included eight 1-day workshops on ecological rodent management technologies, to familiarize farmers with the available technologies, their functioning and associated costs. Farmers showed a strong interest in these workshops as evidenced by the number of participants (in total over 600 farmers participated).

    Formal linkages to local extension organizations and programs have been strengthened, including linkages with PPD, sub-PPDs and World Vision in Vietnam and linkages with AIAT, sub-AIATs and IIRR in Indonesia. An important additional linkage in Indonesia has been the alignment of the project with the Primatani program, which is a new national program for accelerating dissemination of agricultural production technologies.

    Year 2

    The project is progressing according to plan and is on track to meet all milestones.

    The main emphasis of the project over the last 12 months has been training of farmers and regional extension staff to consolidate activities on project sites, and also to encourage adoption of sustainable integrated ecological rodent management in neighbouring villages and districts. There were approximately 40 training activities conducted in Vietnam and Indonesia and an estimated 4000 farmers trained. The capacity of core project staff (10 staff) and technical extension staff (approximately 140) has been increased through on-the-job training and formal training courses and workshops.

    Project activities in Vietnam (Ha Nam province in the Red River Delta and An Giang province in the Mekong Delta) and Indonesia (Karawang district West Java and Pinrang district in South Sulawesi) have concentrated on establishing community actions (CA includes synchronised cropping, field sanitation, community campaigns at key times), and setting up community trap barrier systems (CTBS), training of farmers, cross visits, and demonstration sites. Farmer activities are monitored through farmer diaries (collected every 2 weeks), damage is assessed at 3 key stages of crop growth, and rice yields are collected at the end of each season. Results so far indicate that yields on treatment sites are 1-2% higher than on reference sites and the cost of rodent management actions conducted are less expensive on treatment sites than on reference sites at a village scale.

    The key impacts resulting from project activities over the last 12 months include:
    Community impacts: increase participation of farmers and desire to involve community members to manage rats at a community/village level. Carry-over benefit of mutual management for rodents and brown plant hoppers in the Mekong Delta because of synchronised cropping.
    Economic impacts: less damage observed on treatment sites and slightly higher rice crop yields, leading to benefits for households.
    Social impacts: increased involvement within the farming community to bring a common benefit to the whole community through the rodent management, and involvement in communal rodent management with neighbouring villages.
    Environmental impacts: reduction in the use of rodenticides and plastic sheeting used for constructing barriers around individual rice fields.

    Another key focus of the project is to implement and promote sustainable integrated rodent management at a large scale, achieved through communication and training activities:
    Training activities: Core project staff have undertaken important on-the-job training and structured and formal training courses/workshops, and postgraduate training for 2 ACIAR John Allwright Fellowships for Masters and PhD students to study in Australia.
    Communication and dissemination activities: Review workshops involving farmers, extension staff and project staff were conducted to evaluate results from each season and plan activities for the forthcoming season. There have been many training courses with farmers at different times of crop growth to encourage appropriate use and timing of rodent management to achieve desired outcomes. Thousands of rodent management booklets, leaflets and brochures have been distributed to farmers and extension staff in Vietnam and Indonesia.
    Project planning: Involving all project partners to generate strong commitment and engagement from key staff and key institutions participating in the project. Planning workshops incorporated discussions and actions for communication planning and scaling out strategies.

    The adoption of sustainable integrated ecological rodent management strategies has been promoted through a variety of communication and extension activities to farmers in the target provinces in both Vietnam and Indonesia, but also into neighbouring areas. An important strategy has been to utilise existing extension networks, such as the Primatani system in Indonesia and the "3-reductions and 3-gains" system in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.

    Other key activities include:
    Training with knowledge attitudes and practices and socio-economic farmer survey (KAP&SE) and data entry and preliminary analysis.
    Project site visits to monitor activities conducted by farmers, conduct focus group discussions and key informant interviews, attend project planning workshops and assist with training activities.
    Preliminary analysis of KAP&SE data.
    Key informant interviews in West Java and South Sulawesi with extension agencies, community leaders, credit managers and farmer group leaders to understand the governance arrangements for agricultural extension that condition adoption of the ecological rat control technologies, to understand the structural, financial and cultural barriers to effective extension, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the technologies and extension strategies to date.
    Development of a rodent population dynamics model to link with a farm household model to explore farmer management decisions, which will be linked with a rice crop model to examine resulting changes in damage and yield loss to rice crops.
    Development of household economic models to account for farmer decisions and examine cost-effectiveness of individual and community-based rodent management decisions and specific management scenarios.

    Year 3

    Rodents remain a significant pest of lowland irrigated rice cropping systems throughout Southeast Asia causing around 15% yield loss to rice annually. Rodents are the number one pest of rice in Indonesia and one of the top three pests in Vietnam. Farmers describe rodents as the pest they have least control over. Traditionally, farmers have relied heavily on the use of rodenticides, electrocution and spreading sump oil mixed with insecticides onto flooded rice fields to manage the rodent problem, but these can be expensive, are often applied after significant damage has already occurred, and have environmental problems. Rodents affect households that are dependent on rice production for their livelihoods and impact on poor farming communities who have few resources.
    This project was designed to implement ecologically-based rodent management (EBRM) which can reduce rat damage, increase yields and reduce the reliance on rodenticides. EBRM relies on an understanding of the ecology of rats which then governs better integrated Community Actions (CA; synchronised cropping, field and village hygiene, rat hunts at key times) and the Community Trap Barrier System (CTBS; plastic fence set with rat traps enclosing a small area of early planted rice). These approaches need community cooperation. Key issues are how to deliver EBRM to the wider farming community, develop extension materials, increase cost-effectiveness, build the capacity of support staff, and develop pathways to enhance the adoption of EBRM.
    The project is progressing according to plan and is on track to meet all milestones. The project is due to finish in September 2009. A key focus of the project team is now to quantify the significant adoption and dissemination of EBRM that has occurred, and to complete the post-implementation survey on farmers' knowledge, attitudes and practices. Project activities are concentrated in Vietnam (Ha Nam, Red River Delta; An Giang, the Mekong Delta) and Indonesia (Karawang, West Java; Pinrang, South Sulawesi).
    Key results include:
    Farmers in Vietnam and Indonesia are effectively managing rodents through CA rather than through individual actions. These are applied early in the rice crop. CTBS have been used in specific locations and at specific times when rodent abundance and damage were high. Through farmer experimentation, linear TBS is used effectively in Indonesia.
    The level of rodent damage to rice crops has reduced (now <4% loss). Higher rice yields are reported in areas where EBRM has been implemented.
    There has been significant diffusion of EBRM into neighbouring villages, districts and provinces. In Vietnam, all 11 Districts of An Giang are implementing CA. In Ha Nam province CA is implemented in 152 cooperatives. In Karawang, CA is implemented in all villages in the sub-district. In Pinrang, the control site was converted to a treatment site in October 2008. Training and dissemination has occurred in other provinces in both Indonesia and Vietnam.
    There have been significant community impacts. In-country staff demonstrated their improved capacity through expanding treatment areas (new villages implementing EBRM through CA), and through the implementation of farmer surveys. Key project staff have attended international training courses. Farmers' knowledge and understanding of rodent biology and management has improved leading to community level management.
    Economic impacts have been demonstrated through farmers sharing the cost of CA and materials. Ha Nam farmers contribute rice towards a rat management fund to help pay for community rodent control efforts. Farmers in Indonesia share the cost of purchasing materials and are making cheaper rat traps.
    Multiple social impacts have been achieved through involvement in implementation of CA by a range of community organisations (e.g. Cooperatives, Farmers' Union, Women's Union). Farmers report that they feel a greater sense of community. Farmers in Vietnam look forward to get together at community campaigns to catch rats.
    Significant environmental impacts are felt in the reduction is use of rodenticides by 62-90% in Vietnam and reduction in use of sump oil and insecticide in Indonesia; increased awareness of the problems of using rodenticides; and elimination of using electricity to kill rats in Vietnam.
    A range of training activities has been conducted. Training has occurred in core project areas and in nearby villages leading to the dissemination of EBRM into neighbouring areas. Two project staff attended a training course in the Philippines, and 3 project staff are continuing their training and capacity development through John Allwright Fellowships to undertake post-graduate research degrees in Australia (2 x PhD, 1 x MSc).
    The communication and dissemination activities include a presentation to the new CEO of CSIRO, holding follow-up meetings with farmers to report back about the activities and to plan with active input by farmers for the forthcoming rice crop, and through various radio and TV programs that were aired in Indonesia and Vietnam, and though a high profile demonstration site and display during the National Rice Week in Indonesia (35,000 people attended the ICRR event, included the Indonesian President).
    Ongoing activities include planning meetings and follow-up visits, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. These will clearly articulate the effective adoption pathways, cost-effectiveness, and capacity building impacts.

    Year 4

    Rodents remain a significant pest of lowland irrigated rice cropping systems throughout Southeast Asia causing around 15% yield loss to rice annually. Rodents are the number one pest of rice in Indonesia and one of the top three pests in Vietnam. Farmers describe rodents as the pest they have least control over. Traditionally, farmers have relied heavily on the use of rodenticides, electrocution and spreading sump oil mixed with insecticides onto flooded rice fields to manage the rodent problem, but these can be expensive, are often applied individually by farmers in an uncoordinated manner after significant damage has already occurred, and have environmental problems. Rodents affect households that are dependent on rice production for their livelihoods and impact on poor farming communities who have few resources.
    This project was designed to implement ecologically-based rodent management (EBRM) which can reduce rat damage, increase yields and reduce the reliance on rodenticides. This project builds on the findings from previous ACIAR projects (AS1/1998/036). EBRM relies on an understanding of the ecology of rats which then governs better integrated Community Actions (CA; synchronised cropping, field and village hygiene, rat hunts at key times) and the Community Trap Barrier System (CTBS; plastic fence set with rat traps enclosing a small area of early planted rice). These approaches need community cooperation. Key issues are how to deliver EBRM to the wider farming community, develop extension materials, increase cost-effectiveness, build the capacity of support staff, and develop pathways to enhance the adoption of EBRM. The project was successful in delivering these and implementing EBRM.
    Project activities occurred in lowland irrigated rice systems in Vietnam (Ha Nam province in the Red River Delta and An Giang province in the Mekong River Delta) and Indonesia (Karawang district West Java and Pinrang district in South Sulawesi). It involved a multidisciplinary team of research and extension agencies in Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines and Australia.
    Farming communities in each area were trained and supported in implementing EBRM from 2006. The approach used was the "training-of- trainers" (TOT) of local extension staff which was built up and expanded over the course of the project. Modules were integrated in national training programs. Training and supporting activities expanded from core sites each year and expanded to neighbouring villages and districts over each subsequent year (2007-2009). For example, EBRM activities expanded from 15 communes in Ha Nam Province in 2006 to 152 in 2009. Adoption and diffusion of EBRM was evident outside project areas. There were 17,000 farmers trained in Vietnam and 20,000 farmers trained in Indonesia. Farmer surveys, field observations and interviews were used to assess changes in farmer behaviour and activities.
    The majority of farmers adopted CA as a successful rodent control strategy. The adoption of CTBS occurred only on sites where government subsidies were available to farmers. After implementing EBRM, rodent damage was reduced by 33-50% (reduced by up to 88% in Ha Nam Province), rice yields were increased by 2-5%, rodenticide use was reduced by 62-90%, and the use of electrocution was reduced by 95%. There was a strong shift away from individual actions to group or community actions.
    Key findings to ensure sustainable EBRM include the need to have good coordination between civic and government agencies to enable farmer participation, strong, effective leadership of farmer groups is required, management needs to be conducted early in the growth of the rice crop before rodent populations commence breeding.
    Community impacts include the increase participation of farmers and desire to involve community members to manage rats at a community/village level. There was also benefit of mutual management for rodents and brown plant hoppers in the Mekong Delta because of synchronised cropping. Economic impacts include the reduction in rodent damage leading to increased yields and subsequent increases in benefits for farming households. Social impacts include increased involvement within the farming community to bring a common benefit to the whole community through the rodent management, and involvement in communal rodent management with neighbouring villages. Environmental impacts include the significant reduction in use of rodenticides, plastic sheeting for protecting crops, and use of insecticides mixed with sump oil that was spread over paddy fields. There were 65 scientific reports and publications produced by the project.
    This project has successfully demonstrated that it is possible to implement EBRM with farmers in lowland irrigated rice farming systems in Indonesia and Vietnam. To achieve effective and sustainable EBRM it is recommended to use Community Actions which incorporate synchronised cropping, field and village hygiene, rat hunts at key times, but they need to be supported by local and provincial governments.

    Project Background and Objectives

    In irrigated rice crops, rodents are the number one pre-harvest pest in Indonesia and amongst the top three pests in Vietnam. Rodent pests affect directly the lives of poor farmers in these countries through damage to growing crops, incurring postharvest losses, transmitting diseases to people and livestock, contaminating food and water, and damaging buildings and other possessions. Rodent impacts are greatest among the poorer communities, who have no capacity to absorb either the chronic losses or the occasional acute losses associated with periodic rodent population eruptions.

    Two previous ACIAR projects in Indonesia and Vietnam, together with an ACIAR/World Vision project and an AusAID CARD project in Vietnam, have made substantial advances in ecologically-based rodent management. Four detailed reviews of these projects have been very positive and there has been strong recommendation for extending the village focus to a broader geographic scale.

    Collaborating Institutions

    World Vision of Vietnam, Vietnam
    Plant Protection Department, Vietnam
    International Rice Research Institute, Philippines
    Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, Indonesia

    Overview Methodologies

    The first two years of the project have a district focus, with study sites of approximately 1000 ha. Within the cultural, bio-physical and socio-economic situations of the poor farmers the project team is developing, implementing and quantifying the most (cost-) effective pathways for enhancing the adoption of integrated rodent management technologies. During this period the team is working closely with government extension agencies, farmers and NGOs to evaluate different pathways of adoption, and to develop extension toolkits.

    In the last two years of the project, based on the integrated cultural, bio-physical and socio-economic assessments, the team will use the most successful adoption pathways, institutional linkages and materials to promote sustained adoption of the technologies at the provincial and regional level.

    The project will involve at least three national government and two local government organisations in Indonesia, and three government organisations, local commune councils and one NGO in Vietnam. Farmer clubs and influential farmers are also involved in project development and implementation. A social anthropologist from IRRI is spending 25% of her time on the project to oversee the sociological aspects of the project. Following a recommendation by IAARD (Indonesia), a steering committee is facilitating project development and delivery in Indonesia. The Plant Protection Department, a national agency responsible for extension of crop sciences, is the lead agency in Vietnam.

    The review of AS1/1998/036 also recommended extension of integrated rodent management to new, high priority, regions. South Sulawesi in Indonesia and the delta regions of Vietnam fall into this category, and both governments have a strong focus to improve livelihoods in these poor rural communities.

    Overview Objectives

    The major objective of this project is to develop effective pathways for delivery and uptake of integrated ecologically-based methods for rodent management in poor farmer communities in the Red River delta and central coastal zone of Vietnam, and in South Sulawesi in Indonesia.

    Project Budget

    $757,881.00

    Grant Report Value

    $833669.00

    Grant Report Recipient

    CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

    Grant Report Recipient Post Code

    2601

    Grant Report Finish Date

    31/03/2010

    Grant Report Start Date

    13/04/2006