Main Menu
Assessment of efficiency of farming systems on vertisols and sloping lands using a framework for evaluation of sustainable land management (FELSM)
Project ID
LWR2/1993/722
Project Country
Inactive project countries
Zimbabwe
Commissioned Organisation
International Board for Soil Research and Management, Thailand
Project Leader
Dr Keith Syers
Phone:
66 2 5797590
Fax:
662 561 1230
Project Budget
$116,600.00
Start Date
31/08/1992
Finish Date
30/08/1994
Extension Start Date
31/08/1993
Extension Finish Date
30/05/1996
ACIAR Research Program Manager
Dr Eric Craswell
Overview Objectives
Currently there are no clearly defined guidelines on assessment of sustainable land management. This need has led to corrected effort of international agencies (FAO, ISSS, DSE) and donor agencies (CTA, GTZ, SDC, ACIAR and USAID) to join efforts to formulate a Framework for Evaluation of Sustainable Land Management (FELSM). The project aims to provide the first assessment of a Framework for Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management by considering the efficiency of farming systems on Vertisols (in Zimbabwe and Australia) and sloping lands (in Philippines and Australia) using IBSRAM as the coordinating agency.
Project Outcomes
The activities and achievements of the project are: A) Project Planning - In the first year of the project a successful planning meeting was held in Brisbane from 11-13 October 1993 at which a list of indicators was developed for Vertisols and Sloping Lands which have been distributed quite widely and catalysed thinking and further development by several groups, including QDPI-SEARCA group. B) Economic Dimension - of the FELSM - In March 1994, Professor Clem Tisdell (Professor of Economics, University of Queensland) prepared a concept paper which linked the biophysical and economic dimensions of the Framework (FELSM), to indicate how sustainability indicators can be combined into meaningful economic measures. IBSRAM published the report as Issues in Sustainable Land Management No. 1. C) Work Conducted on Sustainability Assessment - I) even though there were no consistent difference in soil depth and soil chemical and physical parameters between plots of adopter and non-adopters of conservation-farming technologies, better management appeared to contribute to higher yields and net income on adopter plots, ii) effectiveness and commonality of indicators, particularly biophysical ones, for assessing sustainability requires further evaluation, iii) visual indicators of soil quality and sustainability can be complicated by extremes in weather, thus need for several visits to a site, iv) In Zimbabwe productivity is at a low level but soil fertility has not been affected adversely by cropping systems in the last 45 years. However a new tied-furrow technique for improved soil water management scored well in terms of enhanced sustainability, compared to the traditional practice. v) A more useful definition of sustainability 'At the farm level a farming system is sustainable if it continues to satisfy the need of the farmer and does not degrade his/her resource base.'
Location
There are no project locations defined for this project.
