Article links:
Bookmark and Share

Improving smallholder crop-livestock systems in eastern Indonesia

Project ID

LPS/2004/005

Project Country

Commissioned Organisation

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, Australia

Project Leader

Dr Shaun Lisson

Email

shaun.lisson@csiro.au

Phone: 

03 6226 1861

Fax: 

03 6226 2642

Collaborating Institutions

Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, NTB, Indonesia
Department of Agriculture and Livestock, Central Lombok District, Indonesia
Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
University of Mataram, Indonesia

Project Budget

$878,642.00

Start Date

01/01/2005

Finish Date

30/06/2008

ACIAR Research Program Manager

Dr Peter Horne

Overview Objectives

The major objective was to develop, test and apply tools, information and knowledge-sharing techniques appropriate for use at both farmer and extension levels, in order to evaluate the impacts of management interventions into tropical rainfed crop-livestock systems. A second objective was to communicate the outputs of the project to smallholder farmers in the immediate vicinity of the case study sites and more broadly across eastern Indonesia, but also to other providers of research and extension services.

Project Background and Objectives

Beef consumption in Indonesia is rising, in part due to the adoption of more western-style diets. The demand for beef cattle has thus been increasing strongly in Indonesia. This provides a potential opportunity for smallholder farmers who are the main producers of Bali cattle in Indonesia to improve their economic welfare. However, figures indicate that Bali cattle numbers have actually been declining across most regions of Indonesia over the past decade, leading to a supply deficit that is largely being serviced by imports of beef and live cattle from Australia. There is an opportunity to develop and implement strategies at the smallholder level to increase the number and quality of Bali cattle.
Earlier ACIAR research built an integrated crop-livestock systems model, based on conditions in eastern Indonesia, and also developed improved herd management practices. This project sought to apply the earlier technologies to help increase production, focusing on three factors: forage supply and quality; effective herd management; and a better understanding of the trade-offs necessary to increase production.

Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)

Year 1

The project is progressing well with all proposed activities and milestones for the reporting period completed. The project commenced with a whole-of-team project planning meeting in Mataram in early April 2005. The project was officially launched by a representative of the Governor of Lombok. The meeting covered a range of topics including: an overview of the project objectives, activities and milestones; the proposed research methodology; and, discussion and agreement on the roles and responsibilities of each project team member. Separate small group sessions were held on the design & implementation of biophysical and socio-economic benchmarking and monitoring programs.
Farmer workshops were conducted at a transmigrant village in Sumbawa (Desa SPA) and at another village in South Sulawesi (Desa Barru) in April 2005. Benchmarking information relating to these farmers had been collected in previous ACIAR projects. At these workshops, discussions were held in order to clarify the constraints and opportunities to improving livestock production. A shortlist of these opportunities was then selected for analysis using the Integrated Analysis Tool (IAT), a simulation model designed in previous ACIAR projects for exploring the biophysical, economic and social impacts of change in smallholder farming systems. The results of this analysis were then discussed with the farmers in order to identify technically, economically, environmentally and socially feasible 'best-bet' options. A small group of farmers in each village (~5 per village) were then chosen as case study farmers to trial these best-bet options over the course of the project. We then met separately with each case study farmer later in the year, in order to customise the best-bet options to their individual farm operation and to design related on-farm trials. Further biophysical, social and economic benchmarking was undertaken to provide baseline data and information against which impact could be later compared (via the ongoing monitoring activity). The rollout of best-bet trials at these two villages has now commenced in these two villages and will continue over the first half of 2006 (with trials to be repeated in following years).
Benchmarking has commenced in the two other project villages, namely Desa Mertak in Lombok and Desa Pattalikang in South Sulawesi. As these are new villages that were not previously involved in the earlier ACIAR projects, we have had to start from scratch in terms of building relationships with the farmers, village heads and local Dinas staff and management. The benchmarking began with the collection of village and sub-village level secondary structural, production and management data at the village and sub-village level. This was then followed up with small farmer group discussions and individual farmer interviews to further characterise the social, cultural, management and economic attributes of each household. The nature of information gathered and the methods by which it is to be collected were developed collaboratively between Australian and Indonesian project team members. This information will be used at farmer workshops planned for mid 2006 to inform the analysis and selection of best-bet options and be used later as a benchmark for impact assessment activities.
Climate monitoring equipment has been established at each of the four sites to provide daily timestep rainfall, radiation and temperature data. Key soils at the two new villages (Mertak and Pattalikang) have been surveyed with samples collected from the most significant types for chemical characterisation. This data will be used to drive the farming system model component of the IAT. Similarly, forage and livestock monitoring activities have commenced in each of the four villages; for the purposes of benchmarking and model calibration in the case of Mertak and Pattalikang (ie new sites); and for monitoring the impact of best bet strategies in Barru and SPA.
There has been regular contact between this project and the related project entitled: Strategies to increase growth of the weaned Bali calf (AS2/2004/023). Staff from the latter project have attended the aforementioned farmer workshops and annual planning meeting. Feed options arising from the activities of the 005 project will be incorporated into the feeding trials of the 023 project.

Year 2

This project involves working with smallholder farmers in Eastern Indonesia to develop, test and apply tools and knowledge sharing techniques for evaluating strategies to improve Bali cattle production. The approach combines the principles of system analysis in considering the social, economic and biophysical impacts of change, with strong farmer participation in all steps from benchmarking, identification of cattle/forage improvement options and the on-farm testing and communication of findings. The work has involved a multi-disciplinary team comprised of forage, livestock, farming systems scientists, social scientists and economists from a range of Indonesian and Australian Government agricultural research and development agencies.

A one-day annual review meeting was held in Makassar in April 2006 to review and discuss project activity over the first 12 months of the project. The full project team attended along with regional heads of Dinas, representative farmers and village heads from each of the case study villages.

Benchmarking was completed in Desa Mertak, Lombok and Desa Pattalikang, South Sulawesi. The required social and economic information was sourced from a combination of historical village records; structured interviews with farmer groups and individual farmers; and the 'expert-knowledge' of staff from the collaborating extension (Dinas Peternakan) and development (Balai Pengkajan Teknologi Pertanian, BPTP) agencies.

The interviewing of farmers was complemented by the collection of various primary biophysical data relating to forage availability (i.e. composition, quantity, quality), feed management (i.e. grazing, cut and carry, supplements), cattle breeding cycles (i.e. times of mating, calving and weaning), cattle performance (i.e. liveweight gain, condition score, disease, dimensions), soil characteristics (i.e. key physical and soil attributes), climate (i.e. long and short term records of temperature, rainfall and radiation).

This benchmarking information was subsequently used in farmer workshops held at Mertak and Pattallikang in July 2006 to identify best-bet options for improving livestock production. At these workshops, discussions were held in order to clarify the constraints and opportunities to improving livestock production. A shortlist of these opportunities was then selected for analysis using the Integrated Analysis Tool (IAT), a simulation model designed in previous ACIAR projects for exploring the biophysical, economic and social impacts of change in smallholder farming systems. The results of this analysis were then discussed with the farmers in order to identify technically, economically, environmentally and socially feasible 'best-bet' options.

A small group of farmers in Mertak and Pattallikang were subsequently chosen as case study farmers to trial best-bet options arising from the desktop analysis and farmer workshops. We met separately with each of these case study farmers to customise the best-bet options to their individual farm operation and to design related on-farm trials. Trials were subsequently established on each of these case study farms at the commencement of the 06/07 growing season. Data relating to forage yield and quality, livestock production and social and economic impact is being collected across all case study farms and will form the basis for evaluating the impact of best bet activities.

The first year of best-bet trials at the other two focus villages of Desa Barru, South Sulawesi and SPA (Sumbawa) were generally successful. These trials involved a range of different grass and legume forage species to enable the farmer to assess their comparative performance. Farmers were encouraged to establish an area large enough to enable some rudimentary feeding trials and to explore the impacts on cattle growth. At the end of this first year, farmers have formed a view in terms of the preferred forage species and coming into the second (current) growing season have been encouraged to expand the area of forage production thus enabling the trialling of other technology such as preferential feeding and feed budgeting. Farmers were periodically interviewed to gain insights into their experiences and impressions of the technology. The impacts on forage availability and cattle performance are monitored using the same techniques adopted during the benchmarking activities.

The best-bet trials at Barru and SPA were used as a centrepiece for two field days held in the second half of 2006. Best-bet farmers from Mertak and Pattallikang attended along with farmers from surrounding villages, local Dinas staff and other Government officials. These field days served as an invaluable conduit for the exchange of ideas and experiences between farmers and extension agents. Participants were provided with handouts detailing the objective and impacts of each trial. Permanent signs were installed at each site for longer-term exposure. A second series of field days are planned for 2007 across each of the four sites.

Project Outcomes

This project explored the merits of an approach for improving livestock production that combines the principles and tools of farming systems analysis and farmer participation. The process began with an extensive benchmarking process to understand and quantify how the current system functions and the constraints to livestock production. Potential strategies for addressing these constraints were identified and their economic, social and environmental viability assessed using a customised whole farm model. These simulated results were then 'workshopped' with farmers to come up with a shortlist of feasible, best-bet strategies for subsequent on-farm trialling. The on-farm trials thus became an important extension platform for subsequent extension and communication to other farmers within and beyond the target village.
This project identified a range of factors constraining livestock production in the smallholder farming systems of eastern Indonesia including: availability and quality of forages, especially during the dry season; poor knowledge and/or capacity to implement optimum feed management practices; limited supplies of readily accessible stock water; bull availability; inadequate cattle housing; labour availability; extended and sub-optimal breeding cycles; diseases; marketing constraints and limited access of smallholders to the formal credit sector for acquiring cattle and livestock handling materials. Most of the technologies needed to address these constraints have already been developed in Indonesia or elsewhere, but have yet to be adopted by local farmers.
The feedback from farmers and the results from monitoring the on-farm trials indicate that the participatory, farming systems approach was successful. There is a range of evidence to support this including: quantifiable gains in forage and livestock production, labour savings and gains in household income; the intention of most farmers to continue successful strategies; and evidence of significant adoption/adaption of the livestock improvement technologies by other (non-project) farmers.
The pathways to adoption of livestock improvement strategies varied with the region and the technology concerned. Strategies requiring more skill and knowledge to implement, and for which the implications are more complex and less predictable (e.g. changing feed availability or breeding cycle) required greater input from the project team and benefited most from the modelling analysis.
At two of the focus sites, the involvement of village 'champions' was imperative in fostering uptake. Typically, an incremental approach was taken to the rollout of best-bet strategies. The initial focus was to address forage supply and quality constraints through modest plantings of selected forages. The confidence and trust arising from successful adoption of these comparatively simple technologies was then used as an entry point for more complex animal management strategies which require long-term planning and investment.
The Integrated Analysis Tool (IAT) was found to be exceptionally useful in a number of ways:
as a communication tool to inform/underpin the dialogue between the project team and the farmers
enabling rapid analysis of the financial, resource and production impacts of livestock improvement strategies and their sensitivity to key climate, soil, management and farm design variables
screening out less desirable strategies and identifying a shortlist of best-bet options for subsequent on-farm testing, thus ensuring a more efficient and targeted use of limited project resources
providing a degree of confidence to both project staff and farmers that the strategies to be tested on-farm are likely to have a beneficial effect
providing for some farmers the motivation to consider the potential impacts of proposed livestock improvement strategies.
The apparent success of the approaches developed and tested in this project provides support for wider adoption in other regions of Indonesia.

Location

There are no project locations defined for this project.