Main Menu
Development of forest health surveillance systems for South Pacific countries and Australia
Project ID
FST/2001/045
Commissioned Organisation
Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Australia
Project Leader
Dr Ross Wylie
Ross.Wylie@dpi.qld.gov.au
Project Website:
Phone:
07 3896 9781
Fax:
07 3896 9567
Project Budget
$409,188.00
Start Date
01/07/2002
Finish Date
31/12/2004
ACIAR Research Program Manager
Dr Russell Haines
Overview Objectives
The project is working to determine the extent of the problem posed by zoonotic diseases, and to develop control strategies to reduce their impact.
Project Background and Objectives
Most countries and territories in the South Pacific are experiencing a growing demand for animal products, as human populations increase and expectations rise for higher living standards. Greater intensification of animal production in areas with limited land resources has increased the possibility of human-animal contact, and thus the risk of zoonotic disease. Zoonotic diseases are capable of being transmitted directly from animals to humans. Trichinellosis, leptospirosis and angiostrongylosis are the diseases of most concern in the region. Leptospirosis infection causes production loss in livestock and is a serious public health issue, especially for owners of livestock and workers in the processing industry. Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection is an unquantified threat to livestock health and is emerging as a serious public health problem. Trichinella infection in pigs is a barrier to livestock trade and could result in a significant loss to producers. If this organism entered Australia, it could cause severe economic losses to the Australian pork industry. Zoonotic diseases (diseases transmitted from animals to humans) are thought to be increasing in the South Pacific as livestock production intensifies.
Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)
Year 1:
Year 1 (01/07/2002-30/06/2003)
Damage from pests and diseases is a major cause of loss of forest productivity in both natural forests and plantations. Forest Health Surveillance (FHS) systems provide a mechanism to protect the substantial investment in plantations and other managed forests through early detection of pest and disease problems, both indigenous and exotic. The underlying principle is that early detection of a pest problem allows more scope for its management. South Pacific nations have limited capacity and experience in regard to forest health and forestry quarantine issues. This project aims to address that need, providing training in surveillance methodologies and recognition of symptoms of tree disorder, determining priority forest pests and diseases and establishing a support network of relevant experts.
The project commenced in November 2002 with a workshop of Australian participants to develop surveillance methodology that is appropriate for use in the Pacific and a simple and operationally easy recording form. The methodology that was adopted is a modification of that used by FHS units in Queensland and Tasmania for plantation and woodlot survey and for surveillance of port surrounds. A Pacific Forest Health Field Form was also developed for use by project personnel during forest surveys in each country. This was designed to be compatible with the existing SPC Pest List Database (PLD) for the Pacific that will be used to store data collected during this project. It includes some additional forestry-specific fields that have now been accommodated in the PLD.
At a training workshop held for all project collaborators in Suva 31 March to 3 April 2003, the draft methodology was discussed and refined. Group field surveys were then conducted and training provided in FHS techniques, including the use of Global Positioning Satellite equipment, recognition of symptoms of tree disorder, specimen collecting, data recording and entry. Participants were also given an introduction to insect taxonomy and the identification of types of insect and fungal damage to trees. Instruction was provided in methods of specimen handling, curating, shipping and housing. Priorities were formulated for purchase of equipment that is to be used in the setting up of a small, forest health facility in each country. Collecting equipment, reference literature and insect identification keys were distributed to participants for use in each country.
After the April workshop, pest and disease surveys commenced in Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa, and Tonga. These were carried out by teams comprising Australian FHS specialists and staff from the collaborating country organisations plus, on some surveys, a taxonomist. For each country, the surveys were conducted across a range of plantation tree species, provenances, ages, geographic locations, site conditions and time of year using standardised data collecting methods. Further joint surveys were carried out later in 2003. Also post-workshop, Australian taxonomists inspected insect reference collections associated with forestry, agriculture or quarantine in each country with the aim of assessing capacity and needs. Aspects assessed included the size and condition of the collections, housing, databasing/ cataloguing, equipment, staffing, and taxonomic support. A report has been prepared.
Preliminary work has been undertaken in the design of rapid assessment methodology for small woodlots, and field testing began in early 2004. A project web page is under development, and advisory leaflets are being prepared on two key pests and diseases, the cedar shoot borer Hypsipyla robusta and the fungus Phellinus noxius.
Year 2:
Damage from pests and diseases is a major cause of loss of forest productivity in both natural forests and plantations. Forest Health Surveillance (FHS) systems provide a mechanism to protect the substantial investment in plantations and other managed forests through early detection of pest and disease problems, both indigenous and exotic. The underlying principle is that early detection of a pest problem allows more scope for its management. South Pacific nations have limited capacity and experience in regard to forest health and forestry quarantine issues. This project aims to address that need, providing training in surveillance methodologies and recognition of symptoms of tree disorder, determining priority forest pests and diseases and establishing a support network of relevant experts.
In November 2003, mid-project field surveys were conducted in each country by teams comprising Australian FHS specialists and local project personnel, targeting plantations, community tree plantings and port surrounds. Objectives were to reinforce training provided previously, to further refine the methodology, and to gather data on pest and disease status. Specimens were collected for identification in Australia and data recorded. Independently, local personnel in each country conducted forest health surveys over the past year according to schedules set out in their Country Plan. Equipment and materials were purchased locally and sent from Australia for use in the small Forest Health facilities set up in each country.
In three countries, training sessions on forest health have been organised by local project participants for forestry staff in the regions and for community groups. In Vanuatu, a 2-day training workshop was held in Santo in October 2003 on forest health surveillance. This was attended by 30 staff from the Department of Forestry spanning 5 Provinces (Sanma, Penama, Malampa, Shefa, Tafea), and 6 staff from the Vanuatu Quarantine and Inspection Service. Personnel trained at this workshop will be conducting forest health surveys in nurseries, woodlots, agroforestry plots and around ports in the islands of Santo, Ambae, Malekula, Efate, Tanna, Erromango and Aneityum. In Fiji, project staff provided training to personnel from Fiji Pine and Fiji Hardwoods Corporation on methods of forest health surveillance, and in Samoa, similar training was provided to villagers involved in community forestry projects.
In March-April 2004, project personnel from Queensland and Tasmania undertook forest health surveys in eucalypt plantations in Tasmania (around Launceston and Huon Valley). The purpose was to determine the efficacy of detecting symptoms of pest and disease damage during routine forest health surveillance. Methodologies tested were aerial survey, roadside vehicle cruise, and ground surveys (stepped 'V' transect, plots, 'blitz' survey). Data from these surveys are currently being analysed. This is the first such large-scale testing of the methodology in this country. It will facilitate refinement of survey methodology for the type of smaller woodlot planting that commonly occurs in the Pacific, and increasingly, in Australia with joint-venture farm forestry projects.
A web page for the project has been created and is linked to the SPC site. This contains information about the project, ACIAR, forest pests and diseases in the Pacific, and publications arising from the project including survey reports, Country Plans and instruction manuals. Work is continuing on compiling a list of damaging pests and diseases as surveys are completed and organisms identified.
Project Outcomes
Training sessions on forest health were organised in three countries by local project participants for forestry staff in the regions and for community groups. In Vanuatu, 30 staff from the Department of Forestry spanning five provinces and six staff from the Vanuatu Quarantine and Inspection Service attended a two-day FHS training workshop held in October 2003. Personnel trained at this workshop can now conduct forest health surveys in nurseries, woodlots, agroforestry plots and around ports. In Fiji, project staff provided training to personnel from Fiji Pine and Fiji Hardwoods Corporation on methods of forest health surveillance, and in Samoa villagers involved in community forestry projects received similar training.
In March-April 2004 project personnel from Queensland and Tasmania undertook forest health surveys in eucalypt plantations in Tasmania (around Launceston and Huon Valley). They wanted to determine the efficacy of detecting symptoms of pest and disease damage during routine forest health surveillance. Methodologies tested were aerial survey, roadside vehicle cruise, and ground surveys.
The final project workshop was held in Brisbane in October 2004. Its purpose was to reinforce training already provided, to allow Pacific participants to view first-hand some of the forest pest problems and surveillance methodologies used in Australia, and to collate and discuss data collected during the project. The major forest health needs identified in the Pacific were: increased training, increased quarantine awareness, and pest and disease identification.
One major impact arising from the project is the change engendered in the attitudes towards forest health issues within participating countries and across the region. Until now the focus in the Pacific has been primarily on pests of agriculture and horticulture but there is a new awareness of forest health and forest biosecurity across a range of stakeholder groups concerned with agriculture, forestry and quarantine in Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa and Tonga, and with the forestry industry. There has been an increased level of understanding and cooperation between these groups on forest health matters and promise of future collaboration.
The project led to the establishment in the four countries of small, sustainable forest health units, which are conducting ongoing forest and port environ surveys and providing training to forestry staff and community groups. These units now have access to a network of forest health specialists in the region.
The scientific impact of the project has also been significant. The surveys conducted in 2004 by project staff in eucalypt plantations in Tasmania provided valuable information for forest managers and scientists on the efficacy of various methods of pest and disease detection currently in use in forest services around Australia and allowed calculation and assessment of cost/benefit. They became aware of how difficult it is to detect symptoms of damage by organisms such as stem borers and fungal canker at low incidence in plantation trees by any of the methods currently available. The implication for biosecurity is that an incursion of this type of pest in a forest situation is unlikely to be detected sufficiently early to allow eradication, and therefore surveillance should focus on high-risk areas around ports and container facilities.
Another finding is that overview surveillance (e.g. aerial, vantage point) combined with roadside surveys is the most cost-effective methodology for detection of gross symptoms of tree disorder such as dead or dying trees and defoliation. This is the first such large-scale testing of forest surveillance techniques in Australia. It will engender changes in routine plantation surveillance in Australia and facilitate refinement of survey methodology for smaller woodlot plantings here and in the Pacific.
The project has a web page linked to the SPC site. It contains information about the project, ACIAR, forest pests and diseases in the Pacific, and project publications including survey reports, Country Plans and instruction manuals.
Location
There are no project locations defined for this project.
