Main Menu
Development of Leading Centres for mud crab culture in Indonesia and Vietnam
Project ID
FIS/1999/076
Commissioned Organisation
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Bribie Island Aquaculture Research Centre, Australia
Project Budget
$114,220.00
Start Date
01/04/2000
Finish Date
31/03/2002
ACIAR Research Program Manager
Mr Barney Smith
Related publications
Overview Objectives
The main objective of this small project was to develop 'Lead Centres for Crab Aquaculture' at key institutions undertaking nationally funded mud crab research programs in Vietnam and Indonesia.
Project Background and Objectives
Mud crabs are ideal for aquaculture and they are an environmentally friendly alternative to clearing mangroves for shrimp aquaculture. An earlier ACIAR project (FIS/1992/017) made much progress in resolving the problems of rearing technology, leading to significant increases in survival rates of larvae up to crab stage. The findings led to the semi-commercial establishment of production facilities in the Philippines, and the stage was set for the flow-on of benefits to other countries. Indonesia and Vietnam were identified as countries that would derive substantial benefit from the extension of the technologies, and this project developed leading centres for crab aquaculture at key institutions in both countries. Activities included capacity building through training and extension, infrastructure development at the centres, improvement to commercial hatchery technology and translation of the practical handbook from the earlier project into Indonesian and Vietnamese.
Progress Reports (Year 1, 2, 3 etc)
Year 1:
Purpose and context of the project;
Throughout Southeast Asia interest in mangrove or mud crab aquaculture is increasing as wild catches diminish and export incomes decrease. Mud crabs are a common aquaculture species as they grow well in unused shrimp ponds, require less precise water quality than shrimp and can be cultured in mangrove areas, an environment-friendly alternative to clearing for shrimp aquaculture (Macintosh 1996). Mud crab farming is viewed as an alternative to the declining shrimp industry and like shrimp has high potential as an export crop.
Addressing issues regarding hatchery technology remains a major obstacle to providing the industry with a more sustainable foundation. This small project focuses on the transfer of research results to industry to maximise the flow of benefits arising from the earlier mud crab aquaculture project (FIS/92/17). The project concentrates on two countries, Vietnam and Indonesia, that are likely to derive substantial benefit from extension of these technologies.
The main objective is to develop "Lead Centres for Crab Aquaculture" at key institutions undertaking nationally-funded mud crab research programs in the selected countries. Training and extension programs are being developed within these countries to provide for the immediate dissemination of project outcomes and to confer timely support for these nationally funded mud crab aquaculture programs.
A series of eight activities are planned to support the Lead Centres. These activities fall into three components:
I. establishment of additional infrastructure for training and larval rearing trials
II. pilot extension workshops with institutional staff; and
III. locally organised workshops for hatchery operators.
The first two components involve exchanges of staff between BIARC and the institutions to develop the technical capacity, training manual and procedures to be used for the local extension program (Component III). Outcomes of this project will include; capacity building in training and extension methods, development of Lead Centres for in-country extension, improvements to commercial hatchery technology, higher seed crab production and mud crab hatchery manuals translated into Vietnamese and Indonesian.
Collaborating research institutions;
Bribie Island Aquaculture Research Centre (BIARC), Australia
Gondol Research Institute for Mariculture (GRIM), Indonesia
Research Institute for Aquaculture #3 (RIA#3), Vietnam
Results and their value;
Establishment & initial training
Australian and Vietnamese larval rearing methods were compared in Vietnam, giving project staff initial information on both methods prior to developing the hatchery manuals. Key staff from the both Vietnam and Indonesia visiting Australia for commercial-scale larval rearing trials at BIARC. Apart from training in hatchery techniques, drafting of the manual began and the extension workshops were planned.
Institutional extension workshops;
The workshop in Vietnam has been conducted and was well received by those who participated. This activity was important because it enabled a comprehensive update on the status of mud-crab larval rearing methods and other aspects of crab aquaculture to the personel responsible for the wider extension of the information beyond the context of the current project. At this institutional extension workshop it was noted that while this project could initiate extension activities, a larger extension program was needed to accommodate the rapid development of the industry in the north of Vietnam. This will have a bearing on the planning of the hatchery extension workshops remaining to be completed. Changes in project leadership in Australia and Indonesia caused a delay in scheduling of the initial training activity at GRIM, however this is currently in progress. Progress in Indonesia is being encouraged as a matter of urgency because of the continued interest in hatchery rearing of mud crabs.
Future research activities;
In the final phase of the project, the locally organised extension workshops in Vietnam and Indonesia are in the process of being organised for later this year.
Year 2:
Purpose and context of the project;
Throughout Southeast Asia interest in mangrove or mud crab aquaculture is increasing as wild catches diminish and export incomes decrease. Mud crabs are a common aquaculture species as they grow well in unused shrimp ponds, require less precise water quality than shrimp and can be cultured in mangrove areas, an environment-friendly alternative to clearing for shrimp aquaculture (Macintosh 1996). Mud crab farming is viewed as an alternative to the declining shrimp industry and like shrimp has high potential as an export crop.
Addressing issues regarding hatchery technology remains a major obstacle to providing the industry with a more sustainable foundation. This small project focuses on the transfer of research results to industry to maximise the flow of benefits arising from the earlier mud crab aquaculture project (FIS/92/17). The project concentrates on two countries, Vietnam and Indonesia, that are likely to derive substantial benefit from extension of these technologies.
The main objective is to develop "Lead Centres for Crab Aquaculture" at key institutions undertaking nationally-funded mud crab research programs in the selected countries. Training and extension programs are being developed within these countries to provide for the immediate dissemination of project outcomes and to confer timely support for these nationally funded mud crab aquaculture programs.
A series of eight activities are planned to support the Lead Centres. These activities fall into three components:
I. establishment of additional infrastructure for training and larval rearing trials
II. pilot extension workshops with institutional staff; and
III. locally organised workshops for hatchery operators.
The first two components involve exchanges of staff between BIARC and the institutions to develop the technical capacity, training manual and procedures to be used for the local extension program (Component III). Outcomes of this project will include; capacity building in training and extension methods, development of Lead Centres for in-country extension, improvements to commercial hatchery technology, higher seed crab production and mud crab hatchery manuals translated into Vietnamese and Indonesian.
Collaborating research institutions;
Bribie Island Aquaculture Research Centre (BIARC), Australia
Gondol Research Institute for Mariculture (GRIM), Indonesia
Research Institute for Aquaculture #3 (RIA#3), Vietnam
Results and their value;
Establishment & initial training
Australian and Vietnamese larval rearing methods were compared in Vietnam, giving project staff initial information on both methods prior to developing the hatchery manuals. Key staff from the both Vietnam and Indonesia visiting Australia for commercial-scale larval rearing trials at BIARC. Apart from training in hatchery techniques, drafting of the manual began and the extension workshops were planned.
Institutional extension workshops;
The workshop in Vietnam has been conducted and was well received by those who participated. This activity was important because it enabled a comprehensive update on the status of mud-crab larval rearing methods and other aspects of crab aquaculture to the personel responsible for the wider extension of the information beyond the context of the current project. At this institutional extension workshop it was noted that while this project could initiate extension activities, a larger extension program was needed to accommodate the rapid development of the industry in the north of Vietnam. This will have a bearing on the planning of the hatchery extension workshops remaining to be completed. Changes in project leadership in Australia and Indonesia caused a delay in scheduling of the initial training activity at GRIM, however this is currently in progress. Progress in Indonesia is being encouraged as a matter of urgency because of the continued interest in hatchery rearing of mud crabs.
Future research activities;
In the final phase of the project, the locally organised extension workshops in Vietnam and Indonesia are in the process of being organised for later this year.
Project Outcomes
Project achievements in Vietnam were impressive; in Indonesia hatchery technology was refined and staff trained but there was little or no technology transfer. The Indonesian component of the project suffered from problems associated with the change of project leader and security-related travel restrictions.
Given that this was a small project, the project performance in Vietnam alone provided excellent value for money. In Vietnam both the government and other donors provided substantial support. In Indonesia, the inputs were more modest but adequate and commensurate with research progress achieved.
The existence of appropriate technology and potential for commercial mud crab hatcheries was widely promoted to aquaculture industry operators over broad regions within the partner countries. Training workshops for Provincial Fisheries staff and farmers held at RIA3 (Vietnam) and GRIM (Indonesia) were successful in demonstrating all aspects of the hatchery process for mud crabs. Feedback from attendees was very positive and in the case of Vietnam the workshop received national media attention.
The project, through the extension activities, stimulated the commercial application of mud crab hatchery technology. In Vietnam the partner agency RIA3 became recognised nationally as the lead centre for crab hatchery technology and significant Ministry funding led to the commissioning of commercial crab hatcheries in Nhe Ahn and Hai Phong provinces. In Indonesia local growout farmers evaluated seed produced by the GRIM hatchery.
ACIAR developed a linked project (FIS/2000/065) to develop formulated feeds for crab growout: this will involve RIA3 and the Vietnamese project leader is helping consolidate and enhance the progress achieved to date. In Indonesia the research partner GRIM is capable of producing crab seed but will require further support to consolidate the technology to the point where it can be transferred to commercial operators. Indonesia is not directly involved in the followup project but every effort will be made to capture spillover benefits from this work and ensure that relevant opportunities for technology transfer particularly with Vietnam are taken.
The results of this project were reported at an ACIAR funded workshop 'Mudcrab aquaculture in Australia and SE Asia' held in Brisbane in April 2003 and recorded in ACIAR Working Paper No. 54.
Location
There are no project locations defined for this project.
